-8
TheImpossible1 -8 points ago +1 / -9

A curriculum usually comes from a textbook, so that's purely semantics.

What I meant was that it's not that they're getting rid of the boy and girl descriptors outside of this course. It's yet another overblown example of the fictitious "war on women".

-8
TheImpossible1 -8 points ago +1 / -9

They still casted female VAs, female MoCap artists, likely female models to base the characters off...

The answer is no. Their presence is not wanted and not necessary.

-4
TheImpossible1 -4 points ago +2 / -6

She’s a feminist first, which is basically a feminist only.

Exactly. They don't care about success and failure in the same way that the people who hired them do. They care about success in terms of how much they destroyed a male hobby/interest.

-4
TheImpossible1 -4 points ago +1 / -5
  1. He said something pathetic.

  2. He actually is a "noticer"

  3. Maybe she shouldn't defend pedophiles, I tried to lead reports against someone who admitted grooming 16 year old boys and she said "oh, you're just paranoid".

-6
TheImpossible1 -6 points ago +4 / -10

The longer they go without a toxicology report and releasing the manifesto, the more the "Feminist going postal" narrative makes sense.

The only people radical feminists hate nearly as much as men, are women who "enable the patriarchy". I remember a private women-only community on Reddit called for the execution of "boymoms and gender traitors".

-6
TheImpossible1 -6 points ago +6 / -12
  • Not trans

  • feminist

  • acting to kill "female traitors", a common call on TERF communities particularly.

  • The school was the first target, there were more.

Think about it - if the manifesto reinforces the current narrative, burying it doesn't make any difference. It's only if it significantly deviates from what we're being told that it has any value beyond "oh, so the news was right for once."

-10
TheImpossible1 -10 points ago +2 / -12

Did anyone read the article? It's in a textbook about sex, not what they're calling the students.

-4
TheImpossible1 -4 points ago +3 / -7

Archive Link


Yet another "sexism accusation" caused this shit. Fucking Ukrainian, really? They are the most racist pieces of shit on this earth, they came to the UK and complained there were too many brown people, while living off the taxpayer more than those people ever did. Might as well just call it "chair of female supremacy".

If any of you are Formula One Group shareholders, suggest divorcing from the FIA at the next board meeting. It's going to kill our investment.

-7
TheImpossible1 -7 points ago +1 / -8

That was literally the original "surprise, it's a female MC" bait and switch.

-4
TheImpossible1 -4 points ago +1 / -5

Their egos are so large now that they don't have insecurities. They believe they are superior to everyone, regardless of how they look or act.

Have you been outside in the last two years? It's clearly visible in the way they interact with others.

-11
TheImpossible1 -11 points ago +2 / -13

Possibly. I don't watch him, nor would I. I heard that "What is a woman" doesn't even mention the radical feminist mass castration beliefs that clearly motivate the ideology, and it just proved he's controlled opposition.

-6
TheImpossible1 -6 points ago +8 / -14

you have to be a moron to play any game with a forced female MC as it’s guaranteed to be woke Wahman.

Exactly. Any game with female main characters should be avoided.

-3
TheImpossible1 -3 points ago +7 / -10

Lesbianism is a fetish for hating men. It's not a real sexuality.

by folx
-3
TheImpossible1 -3 points ago +2 / -5

There is probably a Twilight porn parody. That's the closest you'll get.

-13
TheImpossible1 -13 points ago +1 / -14

Yes, but all those "free" shows are on platforms where ad revenue gives some kind of safety net.

What I want the answer to be doesn't change that the question is valid.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›