That's an interesting fantasy you've conjured up.
You're still upset?
I highly doubt they will. Pocketpair opted for "body type" over "sex/gender", so they're willing to compromise with the subversive leftist element. In their defense, though, that's the only red flag I've noticed.
Two people have already tried that, and it didn't work. At least be original.
I've articulated what I meant. You're the one who unnecessarily outed yourself. You do not have the privilege of showing I've struck a nerve, and simultaneously act oblivious.
Why don't you just fuck off already?
Nah.
I think you've dug yourself deep enough, yeah?
Surely you must realize that leftoid concern trolls like yourself
Immediately discrediting yourself right out the gate! Nice!
Try again.
You're unhinged. Seek help.
To not be deliberately designed to look like they're in their early teens, but you knew that. C for effort.
People are still pretending there was a problem with the ending of the Mass Effect trilogy? If nothing else, I guess I have to admire the persistence.
Someone else already tried that shtick, and it didn't work. Better luck next time.
I'm not really concerned with the opinion of someone who expresses a dissenting opinion on objective fact. It has zero value. It would be worth as much to me if you were to be mad at the sky for being blue.
It's in the face, but you knew that. Throwing a tantrum about this after you've been called on it isn't a good look. Nobody would have even known it applied to you if you didn't chime in.
My memory of this game was somehow altered, and I spend the longest time remembering that Shadows of Amn was a Neverwinter Nights game. It wasn't until I watched Warlockracy's Baldur's Gate 3 video that I was corrected. Great game, though, and RPG developers in that era generally did a good job of making games look good. Someone made a comment some time ago about a lot of that stuff being a result of creativity bred by limitation.
A lot of people like to pretend to champion the cause, claiming everyone should have a voice. They pretend to believe in the old mantra "I don't agree with what you say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it." They don't actually believe this. Why should they? Why should people have the right to free speech? The Right would fall into order well enough, but leftists are irreverent heathens who do nothing but show the world why allowing them to express themselves was a mistake.
I don't support freedom of speech. Allowing everyone to have a voice is why and how we got here.
You're going to have to do better than that.
These characters do look underage a lot of times, so they do have a point. A broken clock and all that. The rightoids obsess over these characters, but they still want to cozy up to the Right under the misguided assumption they're one of us.
I will not be guilted, shamed, or mocked by useless rightoids.
People on the right do this because that's exactly what it is, and rightoids know exactly what they're doing. The "well ackshually" argument isn't going to save them from looking creepy for obsessing over people who are intended to look underage.
When I see people unironically post things like that, I don't think "What a considerate person." I think "What a colossal faggot." The most soylent, limp-wristed faggot that has to carry their grocery bags from Whole Foods inside one at a time.
No pronouns in bio, which is quite a surprise. Equally surprising that there's a reference to a Bible verse. Psalms 27:13 "I remain confident of this: I will see the goodness of the LORD in the land of the living." Current Thing™️-ers generally seethe at any mention of scripture. The temple of ABK could use whips and table-flipping. I don't have high expectations, of course, but it's interesting.
You came back to continue throwing a tantrum almost 12 hours later, and continually throw "cope" around despite very clearly being the one who was touched by what was said. It wasn't discourse. I was stating a fact. There's nothing for me to cope with.