-9
RealDrJester -9 points ago +4 / -13

Masochist into what?

I love proving stormcucks wrong. I get some awesome pleasure out of it.

-10
RealDrJester -10 points ago +4 / -14

I agree, monitoring by international organizations is needed. But one can not stop the research of disease. There is still a lot we do not know about many viruses and bacteria out there(Even to those we already know a lot). And we need the research.

Plus, I trust more on Ukrainian scientist than a Chinese scientist in Wuhan.

-19
RealDrJester -19 points ago +1 / -20

Cool... Free to Jordan? To Egypt? Or free-free? Had multiple chances, they refused. Gaza is free now. Even Egypt is not that quite interested in them either.

Are you done with whataboutism?

-17
RealDrJester -17 points ago +5 / -22

Research on disease is very different from weaponized research on disease. And anything coming out of Ukraine itself I doubt it, but anything coming out Russia I doubt it even more.

So, pressing X here.

-23
RealDrJester -23 points ago +2 / -25

Ribbentrop-molotov, that is all

-29
RealDrJester -29 points ago +3 / -32

It is even more funny seeing somebody reeeeeing over the fact that shoes fit and they should wear it.

-31
RealDrJester -31 points ago +4 / -35

It is funnier seeing stormcucks beat around the bush when shown their support of Russia aligns with commies(and history repeating itself) and the Islamic brigade of Chechnyans in the Russian army.(which I don't judge, but if you are going to judge the whole of Ukraine because of retarded inbreds in their army then I will do so for the Russians)

-9
RealDrJester -9 points ago +3 / -12

Some countries in the west may be a disaster in free speech and liberty. But they are bastions of freedom in comparison to what the average Russian faces in censorship and persecution in Russia.

-1
RealDrJester -1 points ago +2 / -3

My apologies. I forgot the world is run by cheat codes and bunker busting bombs can not penetrate the reactors of a nuclear power plant. My bad!

I think America should build a nuclear reactor to house their presidents instead of a bunker. That way, they will be safer, as it is immortal, and indestructible.

-2
RealDrJester -2 points ago +1 / -3

Do you know that there are bombs that are not nuclear? It is a relatively old invention. Some even have special abilities like cluster, bunker busting, fire, and even be guided to target!

-6
RealDrJester -6 points ago +1 / -7

Yep, Russians don't really care much for human lives. Their entire doctrine in war has been like that. We saw it on WWII, on the design of their equipment during the cold war era, and today.

-2
RealDrJester -2 points ago +1 / -3

Nuclear power plants don't turn into nuclear bombs because a chunk of wall falls down.

And where exactly did I make that claim?

I said that if a bomb falls on top of the reactor, it will destroy it, and containment will be null and void. you are grasping at straws.

-2
RealDrJester -2 points ago +1 / -3

So, a bunker busting bomb exploding on top of the reactor will not cause anything bad?

Wow... you really have no idea.

-2
RealDrJester -2 points ago +1 / -3

When was the last time the world went to war next to a nuclear reactor? Do you really think that a bomb can't level a reactor? Why not hide the president there, since that is impervious to any damage!

Once again, the new reactors were built. But you are, once again thinking things can be invincible. Ukraine does not have the cheat codes for immortality.

-6
RealDrJester -6 points ago +1 / -7

Pressing X

-5
RealDrJester -5 points ago +1 / -6

was currently being modified and refitted.

aka not finished

Once again, real life is not a video game. Things can be destroyed. It can be mitigated with safety features, but nothing is invincible or indestructible. And you will know I said more than tank fire. I said bombs, anti-armour weaponry and more.

Go check it out. You chose to be angry first, and read second.

-8
RealDrJester -8 points ago +2 / -10

Did they predict the future? Because they all began construction in 80's, the first ones commissioned in 86 and 87. Chernobyl happened in the 26th of april 1986

Thank you for telling me you do not understand how bombs work and that you believe buildings are invincible. I blame the lack of destruction physics on games for this.

-7
RealDrJester -7 points ago +2 / -9

There are bunker busting bombs, Armour piercing shells and more. An earthquake is a different action from a direct hit from one of those things.

You are comparing apples with oranges here. You are also not accounting for old soviet infrastructure, no upgrades or subpar upgrades on the older reactors and more. An earthquake is far different from a bomb falling through on a reactor.

-9
RealDrJester -9 points ago +1 / -10

One must remember that even the power plants of today having more safety measures to avoid another Chernobyl, a well placed bomb, stray shell can cause a big massive problem. As not many power plants are built to withstand constant pounding of bombs, rockets, and shells. As far as I know even bunkers have a limit and are not invincible. Zelensky was right.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›