Once again, real life is not a video game. Things can be destroyed. It can be mitigated with safety features, but nothing is invincible or indestructible. And you will know I said more than tank fire. I said bombs, anti-armour weaponry and more.
Go check it out. You chose to be angry first, and read second.
Go find the last nuclear reactor that imploded from an artillery strike. I’ll wait. If you’re so dense as to think reactors are only outfitted every 40 years you would be correct, except this was the most recent update started in 2019. Again you could spend the 5 minutes reading what occurred or keep sperging. There’s no reason for Russia to ignite a reactor that would take them out with Ukraine.
When was the last time the world went to war next to a nuclear reactor? Do you really think that a bomb can't level a reactor? Why not hide the president there, since that is impervious to any damage!
Once again, the new reactors were built. But you are, once again thinking things can be invincible. Ukraine does not have the cheat codes for immortality.
You need to look at your own advice. Red barrels don't explode when being shot at. Cars don't burst into flames when a bullet riccochets off them. Nuclear power plants don't turn into nuclear bombs because a chunk of wall falls down.
Do you know that there are bombs that are not nuclear? It is a relatively old invention. Some even have special abilities like cluster, bunker busting, fire, and even be guided to target!
My apologies. I forgot the world is run by cheat codes and bunker busting bombs can not penetrate the reactors of a nuclear power plant. My bad!
I think America should build a nuclear reactor to house their presidents instead of a bunker. That way, they will be safer, as it is immortal, and indestructible.
aka not finished
Once again, real life is not a video game. Things can be destroyed. It can be mitigated with safety features, but nothing is invincible or indestructible. And you will know I said more than tank fire. I said bombs, anti-armour weaponry and more.
Go check it out. You chose to be angry first, and read second.
Go find the last nuclear reactor that imploded from an artillery strike. I’ll wait. If you’re so dense as to think reactors are only outfitted every 40 years you would be correct, except this was the most recent update started in 2019. Again you could spend the 5 minutes reading what occurred or keep sperging. There’s no reason for Russia to ignite a reactor that would take them out with Ukraine.
When was the last time the world went to war next to a nuclear reactor? Do you really think that a bomb can't level a reactor? Why not hide the president there, since that is impervious to any damage!
Once again, the new reactors were built. But you are, once again thinking things can be invincible. Ukraine does not have the cheat codes for immortality.
"Life is not a video game"
You need to look at your own advice. Red barrels don't explode when being shot at. Cars don't burst into flames when a bullet riccochets off them. Nuclear power plants don't turn into nuclear bombs because a chunk of wall falls down.
And where exactly did I make that claim?
I said that if a bomb falls on top of the reactor, it will destroy it, and containment will be null and void. you are grasping at straws.
They're not nuking a nuclear reactor. Spit that doomerpill out.
Do you know that there are bombs that are not nuclear? It is a relatively old invention. Some even have special abilities like cluster, bunker busting, fire, and even be guided to target!
And you trust Russians to be well behaved?
So, a bunker busting bomb exploding on top of the reactor will not cause anything bad?
Wow... you really have no idea.
My apologies. I forgot the world is run by cheat codes and bunker busting bombs can not penetrate the reactors of a nuclear power plant. My bad!
I think America should build a nuclear reactor to house their presidents instead of a bunker. That way, they will be safer, as it is immortal, and indestructible.