I'm not sure what you're talking about and it doesn't seem interesting enough to wade through and suss it out with you.

Of course nothing will happen. The judicial branch is just as responsive to social pressure as any other branch of our nation. And, as long as they control the media they'll continue running rampant and doing whatever they wish. With no consequences.

Youtube podcasts can only get us so far.

But it's a start I guess.

Meanwhile, they're pumping out books, magazines, blockbuster movies, songs, paintings, VR games, websites, social forums, multi-million dollar "news" channels, whole departments of the highest ranked universities on Earth, churning out professional "actors" to spread their message, etc.

Narrative control first injects a suggestion (tavistock); then perpetuates it (news); then let's it trickle down (e-celebs) to learn what "styx". His job here is the kosher racket aka boiling the initial suggestion down to keep the conflict of reason (truth vs false) going; which was caused by consent to believe in the initial suggestion.

Kind of a fancy way to say Churnalism. I like it though. +1

Edit: or maybe not. Maybe I'm playing loose and fast with the definition of "Churnalism."

This dude has always been about three - ten months behind on every issue. It's quite endearing. Hey, someone's gotta put it all together and get rich stating the obvious...I guess?