This dude has always been about three - ten months behind on every issue. It's quite endearing. Hey, someone's gotta put it all together and get rich stating the obvious...I guess?
Narrative control first injects a suggestion (tavistock); then perpetuates it (news); then let's it trickle down (e-celebs) to learn what "styx". His job here is the kosher racket aka boiling the initial suggestion down to keep the conflict of reason (truth vs false) going; which was caused by consent to believe in the initial suggestion.
Narrative control first injects a suggestion (tavistock); then perpetuates it (news); then let's it trickle down (e-celebs) to learn what "styx". His job here is the kosher racket aka boiling the initial suggestion down to keep the conflict of reason (truth vs false) going; which was caused by consent to believe in the initial suggestion.
Kind of a fancy way to say Churnalism. I like it though. +1
Edit: or maybe not. Maybe I'm playing loose and fast with the definition of "Churnalism."
Pejorative aside; what's important for control is the -ism; because that is what free will of choice is consenting to by both believing/nor believing the suggestion. Control is not about what one believes, but that one consents to a suggestion by another one. Why? Because to use free will to consent to a suggestion offered by the free will of another; represents ignoring ones own free will aka the sole authority over ONEself within ALL, in favor for the false authority (their free will) of another ONE.
That represents the fundamental deception for control through suggestion...offer meets consent.
Consenting to a suggestion requires belief; belief causes the conflict of reason (truth versus false). The few make suggestions (-isms) to divide (reason) the many.
Who suggested entertainment (enter tame mind) and who consents by free will of choice?
intellectual
IN'TELLECT, noun (Latin intellectus, from intelligo, to understand)...that refers to ONEs comprehension of ALL perceived; not to what ONE consents to believe from the suggestion of another ONE.
Comprehension represents ONEs potential within ALL potentiality, and it's build by choice of action (free will).
Perception (input) to choice based comprehension (processing) to action (output)...that's ONEs conscious communication with ALL.
So very true. And more people need to open their eyes to the absurdity of wealthy black people making lots of money by talking about how oppressed they are
There's way more noise about it. There is more legislation done at the state and local level to push CRT fucks out.
Whether or not it's too late is the question, but at least people are talking about it in the modern lexicon. The average boomer now knows what CRt is and how fucking DANGEORUS it is.
It's not a plot. It's Marxism for a different time and place.
To me, that's the difference between CRT and "black power." If you say "black power," only 13% of people are oppressed, and you can't make a proletariat out of that. If you say, BIPOC and women and sexual deviants and NEETs are oppressed, then you have a majority.
The plot should not have gotten any traction in the first place. But that's what happens when we think we can just laugh at and otherwise ignore evil, insane people.
This dude has always been about three - ten months behind on every issue. It's quite endearing. Hey, someone's gotta put it all together and get rich stating the obvious...I guess?
Narrative control first injects a suggestion (tavistock); then perpetuates it (news); then let's it trickle down (e-celebs) to learn what "styx". His job here is the kosher racket aka boiling the initial suggestion down to keep the conflict of reason (truth vs false) going; which was caused by consent to believe in the initial suggestion.
Kind of a fancy way to say Churnalism. I like it though. +1
Edit: or maybe not. Maybe I'm playing loose and fast with the definition of "Churnalism."
Pejorative aside; what's important for control is the -ism; because that is what free will of choice is consenting to by both believing/nor believing the suggestion. Control is not about what one believes, but that one consents to a suggestion by another one. Why? Because to use free will to consent to a suggestion offered by the free will of another; represents ignoring ones own free will aka the sole authority over ONEself within ALL, in favor for the false authority (their free will) of another ONE.
That represents the fundamental deception for control through suggestion...offer meets consent.
I'm not sure what you're talking about and it doesn't seem interesting enough to wade through and suss it out with you.
Free-will-of choice is a fucking bot. Hey free will, what’s too human’s worrth of legs minus (-) one ? If you can’t answer that question you’re a bot.
Consenting to a suggestion requires belief; belief causes the conflict of reason (truth versus false). The few make suggestions (-isms) to divide (reason) the many.
The foundation of narrative control.
oh god, we've got a rick and morty intellectual here
I see that cultist pop in here from time to time. And people keep responding to him.
Who suggested entertainment (enter tame mind) and who consents by free will of choice?
IN'TELLECT, noun (Latin intellectus, from intelligo, to understand)...that refers to ONEs comprehension of ALL perceived; not to what ONE consents to believe from the suggestion of another ONE.
Comprehension represents ONEs potential within ALL potentiality, and it's build by choice of action (free will).
Perception (input) to choice based comprehension (processing) to action (output)...that's ONEs conscious communication with ALL.
So very true. And more people need to open their eyes to the absurdity of wealthy black people making lots of money by talking about how oppressed they are
There is so much young black millionaires
Marxist revolutions are always funded by capitalists. Capitalism vs communism is a false dichotomy to fuel the progressive dialectic.
The American right died on December 7, 1941.
Basically:
Are they?
There's way more noise about it. There is more legislation done at the state and local level to push CRT fucks out.
Whether or not it's too late is the question, but at least people are talking about it in the modern lexicon. The average boomer now knows what CRt is and how fucking DANGEORUS it is.
It's not a plot. It's Marxism for a different time and place.
To me, that's the difference between CRT and "black power." If you say "black power," only 13% of people are oppressed, and you can't make a proletariat out of that. If you say, BIPOC and women and sexual deviants and NEETs are oppressed, then you have a majority.
The plot should not have gotten any traction in the first place. But that's what happens when we think we can just laugh at and otherwise ignore evil, insane people.