5
Mpetey123 5 points ago +5 / -0

It's another case of some super naive girl going to someone's hotel room and having no idea the man may want sex. These poor women probably expected to play Monopoly or something. /s

25
Mpetey123 25 points ago +25 / -0

This dude got a slap on the wrist for flashing children, and the court and media protected his identity. Then this dummy argues his case on Facebook outting himself and making threats.

These people are insane and in order to protect their insanity countries are destroying the law to protect them

2
Mpetey123 2 points ago +2 / -0

I might seek it out. Thanks for the recommendation

2
Mpetey123 2 points ago +2 / -0

Can't say I remember seeing it. So Mumy was reprising his role as the kid, but grown?

2
Mpetey123 2 points ago +2 / -0

I would guess so, maybe the god-like kid would be second

3
Mpetey123 3 points ago +3 / -0

You'd have time enough at last.

6
Mpetey123 6 points ago +6 / -0

Sometimes when you mention your books, movies you've got waiting to read, I picture you as Burgess Merideth in that Twilight Zone episode.

1
Mpetey123 1 point ago +1 / -0

Her naivete fluctuates through the series. But to be fair most of the folks in Mayberry have floating naivete. Andy is supposed to be the character who is on top of things, but hides it beneath his folksy demeanor

10
Mpetey123 10 points ago +10 / -0

I would argue that the Jokers themselves are the butt of most of their jokes. And second the assault claims are two years old and highly dubious.

9
Mpetey123 9 points ago +9 / -0

I like this interpretation. I read an article once, that got a lot of push back, that called Ghostbusters a conservative, capitalist movie.

13
Mpetey123 13 points ago +13 / -0

Don't be fooled, Johnny 5 was a member of Los Locos. A dangerous gang known for kicking balls into outer space

6
Mpetey123 6 points ago +6 / -0

Howard would have secretly had kids in the basement making meth and was lying about the foundation to make more room for his child slavery. And Bea would want robes so she could be naked underneath and had a fetish for rubbing against things in her robe

2
Mpetey123 2 points ago +2 / -0

Where did I say anything about Bea being married?

4
Mpetey123 4 points ago +4 / -0

Even if you viewed it as Bea as a villain how does that change anything about the portrayal of how men and women think?

7
Mpetey123 7 points ago +7 / -0

I remember that episode. If I remember she was mostly running to have a female option. She didn’t have any plans or ambition, just the council needed someone with a vagina on it. And like you said Howard had ideas and ambition.

Aunt Bea ends up endorsing Howard I believe after she looks foolish in a debate. I've watched too much Andy Griffith, lol.

They pulled a lot of soft Bea feminist shit especially after the show switched to color.

9
Mpetey123 9 points ago +9 / -0

Howard wasn't acting like a child. He's part of the Church Finance committee and suggests a prudent suggestion for the money. When he sees how important the robes are to Bea, he looks for a solution to help Bea and the foundation problem. I don't see what Howard did wrong or how he was being childish or emotional.

8
Mpetey123 8 points ago +8 / -0

Yes, there are a lot of female empowerment episodes. You can tell people who complain about it being conservative never watched it.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›