I completely agree. People often think the slippery slope fallacy applies to any statement that A could maybe lead to Z and Z is not the guaranteed outcome. In truth, it's only a fallacy when A cannot lead to Z at all (or at least, Z seems very implausible).

For example (for anyone still unclear about this):

"Developing nuclear weapons will lead to nuclear war" = Slippery slope fallacy. Nuclear war isn't guaranteed to happen just because a nation has nuclear weapons.

"Developing nuclear weapons could lead to nuclear war" = Not a slippery slope fallacy. Nuclear war could indeed happen if someone has nuclear weapons.

This is old, Cartman's mom is much older now.

The publication, for those who want to read it.

The part about giving information about masturbation to children 0-4 is in the matrix on page 40.

Wait until they come up with the argument that it isn't healthy for teenagers to experiment sexually with each other, and it would be better to have adults teach them by literally having sex with them. Then they'll create legislation that allow 'professional sex teachers' of some sort to have sex with minors, and over time adult family members will probably get that right too. Age of consent will also be lowered slowly, at least until it reaches the single digits.

The radical left has no limit when it comes to tolerance, especially sexual tolerance. Nothing is ever too far or too much for them, they'll get behind any shitty argument that seems to hold some truth on the surface. And that tolerance attracts pedos of course, which is why there are so many among the radical left.

I know it sounds like hyperbole right now, but let's talk about it again in 20 years. When acting like a human dog in fetish leather gear in public is called homosexuality, then fucking minors can be called education.

God damn that program is fucking child abuse! The people behind this need to be held accountable! They're traumatizing kids and getting a pass because it's all under the guise of 'fighting racism'. Sick, vile and disgusting.

anthem for anyone wondering

They might replace one with John Wilkes Booth now that Lincoln is problematic.

The thing they will never admit is that they benefit from the enslavement of their ancestors by living in America instead of Africa.

"I'm not racist, I just think it's not OK to be white!"

I had to research it, and he seems more pedo than asshole. He's gay and he did this kind of thing often, where he'd get underage boys to undress under the pretense of a bet or a challenge. According to one of his victims, he even convinced an asian boy (a minor) to show him his penis to prove it was average-sized when erect.

Anything could happen in 10 years though. Aaron Swartz was huge about free speech when he created Reddit, but then he sold it and look what happened. Not that I fault him for selling it, of course, but it shows anything can change unexpectedly and we should always be prepared.

But right now and for the near future? I trust the admins at The Donald.

The irony of using commie repression tactics while calling Americans traitors.

In fairness, they are code words.

I really wish when people post something related to some semi-obscure drama that is specific to a franchise, they would take the time to provide a short recap of the situation for those who aren't in the know :/

This is good for us, Reddit is shooting themselves in the foot. Once moderate users on Reddit only see hate towards whites and men, since that's allowed, they'll begin to think hate towards minorities is pretty much non-existent whereas the opposite is widespread and condoned, and they'll turn against the radical left.

The only thing I'm wondering is whether the admins are just this stupid, or if they actually know what they're doing. I think they know Silicon Valley will be the next target once BLM and radical leftists are tired of destroying statues and attacking Dungeons and Dragon. They're pretty much all white millionaires/billionaires. It's in their financial interest to turn the public opinion against these movements now, and even to ensure a Trump victory this year. Their current tactic let's them do this while being able to claim they're on the side of minorities.

It's the same with those people who think everyone in World War II should have fought the Nazis and saved the Jews. You don't see them trying to free prisoners in China, North Korea, or even from those immigrant detention centers in the US.

But sure, everyone who didn't hide Jews in their attic and storm Auschwitz with a hunting rifle tacitly endorsed Nazis!

Look, I don't have a problem with it when it's fun for both partners. As in, Partner 1 gets turned on that Partner 2 is having sex with someone else. That's just a couple engaging with other people in a sexual fantasy they both enjoy. I'll even admit I think 3 people being in a relationship with each other can work if all of them know how to handle that and love each other equally.

But when Partner 2 is having fun on their own while Partner 1 gets nothing out of it (except maybe the right to have fun on their own with other people as well) that's when problems tend to arise - Partner 1 is often not OK with it but feels they can't say no for a variety of reasons (most having to do with low self-esteem), or both of them are using polyamory as a futile attempt to fix other problems in a relationship that is doomed to fail.

And then you have those people for whom polyamory means having a sexual and emotional connection with multiple lovers at the same time. There is no way this can ever lead to the same kind of closeness you'll ever have in a monogamous relationship. Polyamory in this context is just a PC way of saying "Multiple friends with benefits".

my logic is simple. we want whats best for our partners > 0 restrictions

You don't have to stay with a partner who wants something you aren't comfortable with. Leaving such a relationship to find someone compatible is always an option.

our needs and contexts vary wildly > maximum flexibility

That's pretty much the same argument as above phrased differently.

the ultimate does not feel > is not controlled by jealousy and other possesive feels

It's not jealousy to want a partner who is solely dedicated to you when it comes to love and romance. If your partner is going around, spreading their time, feelings and focus between multiple romantic relationships, the two of you will never grow as close as you could in a monogamous relationship.

yi im asexual > graysexual .. rarely feel sexual attraction and i only have 1 partner. but have been studying this for a 7-10 years.

That's the thing, you won't understand the perspective of those who are strictly into monogamy if you don't experience sexual attraction and what it does to you. You can study it for a century, but like all things, you need to have some insight into it to really understand it. I'm not trying to bash you, you're just the way you are. I just want you to realize there's some understanding you're missing.

I would never be in a relationship with a black woman just because of how retarded society is about race these days. Our relationship would always be subjected to identity politics by others, and I would always be reminded I'm not just dating a woman but a black woman.

I would if a few reasonable conditions were met:

• Not only give KK the boot, but vehemently denounce her for what she did to Star Wars.

• Blacklist anyone associated with the sequels who said fans hated them because of misogyny.

• Make the sequels non-canon.

• Make the Expanded Universe canon again (although I'd be fine if some of the worst stories in there remained non-canon)

• Make new stories that are in the spirit of the first trilogy, with good stories, characters, etc... Basically none of the problems of the sequels. And no SJW stuff either.

• Keep CGI to a minimum. Go back to making physical costumes, props, models, painted backgrounds... This made the original trilogy feel much more real than the prequels.

• Remake the prequels. Keep the plot but ditch the unnecessary CGI, and the bad acting and dialogues. Also either ditch Jar-Jar or implement the theory that he was secretly a sith master pulling all the strings.

• Last but not least: produce and sell quality stormtrooper armor (from the OT), complete with integrated voice changer. Give a 50% discount to anyone born before 2000 as a show of appreciation to original fans.

Only if all of the above happen, then I might come back to Star Wars. As of now, I'm not into the Disney stuff and I consider the original trilogy and expanded universe to be the only "real" Star Wars as far as I'm concerned. Hell I'll even consider the ewok movies canon.