It's amazing. It's something I've noticed time and time again in online communities. The more you restrict people's speech, and the more you force people to be civil and kind to each other, the nastier and more immature people get. It's almost as if, if you treat people like children who can't control themselves without jannie intervention, they will take on that role and act on it, whereas if you treat people like adults who are responsible for their own actions and for their own reputations, they'll act like adults instead.
We don't all agree when it comes to policies and worldviews, yet this whole place is incredibly welcoming, regardless of how much more left-leaning we (and especially half-KIA) are compared to our neighbours.
This sort of neighbourly and genuinely positive (and not just "cashier smile" kind of positive) interaction between people, especially people who don't necessarily fully agree, is what is going to lead to the healing and rebuilding of western society after all these calamitous events. It takes all kinds of people to keep a society running, after all.
That's exactly what I said too, it's like the earlier internet when it was actually good and not centralised. I guess technically we're dependent on The Donald, but honestly, I doubt they'd exert their influence on the .win network, they're very libertarian, I think.
Anything could happen in 10 years though. Aaron Swartz was huge about free speech when he created Reddit, but then he sold it and look what happened. Not that I fault him for selling it, of course, but it shows anything can change unexpectedly and we should always be prepared.
But right now and for the near future? I trust the admins at The Donald.