Comment Reported for: Rule 12 - Intentional Falsehoods
I don't see why.
Post Reported for:
- Rule 6 - NSFW Content
- Other Illegal Content
Post Already deleted.
Telia, It seems like you're posting gore porn. Stop that shit.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks (x2)
This comment doesn't do that.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
This comment doesn't do that.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Approved: This doesn't do that.
You can't, though. That's part of the problem. Those definitions don't actually well define genetic human strata. That's why anyone talking about biological race resorts to phenotypes.
Hell, Caucasoid has never really made sense to apply that term to western Europeans.
If not, what constitutes an attack on race, rather than religion.
The specification of the speaker.
The issue is which biology. The biology of human stratification has very little, and has literally nothing to do with culture. Cultural variances are more likely to be influenced by geography than by race. Individual behavior is more directly influenced by parenting than by race or geography.
Race, in it's abstract form, is utterly worthless in determining culture and behavior.
Race, in it's biological form, is outweighed by other factors.
I think it absolutely does.
Btw every follower of Islam will also say those people who don't follow Islam are not Muslims.
This is part of an interesting point, because what we call "Jihadis" is what Saudi Arabians call "Takfirists". Basically, they kill Muslims by 'Takfiring" them and declaring them to be non-Muslims, and then kill them. It's why so many Islamic Terrorist attacks kill Muslims while Islam explicitly bans killing Muslims.
But yes, your first sentence is fine.
Or, additionally, a Useful Idiot.
I've literally had a muslim directly tell me that Islam has never been spread by war. It's kind of like living in a Leftist buble.
You would make a rule banning anti-white hate speech on day 1.
Comment Reported for: Username
Comment Removed for: Rule 16 - Identity attacks, and possibly Rule 1 with the name.
Asserting Judeo-Bolshevism.
Comment Reported for: Rule 3 - Harassment
Comment Approved: This isn't really harassment because he's not actually following Cato around unprompted. This is part of a thread in which Cato's objections are being laid bare. This kind of 3rd Party injected criticism seems to happen a lot with controversial statements.
Comment Reported for: Rule 15 - Slurs
Comment Approved: You're allowed to call each other retards.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Approved: Retards & goblins are not an identity group, really.
Post Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Post Approved: This is not an identity attack, and no I'm not a jew.
That's because 'race' is a complete misnomer, and it was religion, culture, and ethnicity.
Race, in the way it is used in the American sense, is a purely abstract concept that pretends to have biological legitimacy. Race, even as used by Enoch Powell, wasn't used to describe everyone of a certain skin color, but was more nuanced than that. This is why the definition of "white" people's changed as much as it did. It didn't literally mean everyone from anywhere that fell along a certain color swatch. When he used it, it mostly meant British.
Biological race makes some sense as a form of human stratification; but is mostly disconnected from culture and religion.
And I will criticize muslims too.
Right, based on cultural and societal doctrines. That's why none of this is a rule violation.
No, and Arab would be more of a clear violation.
I agree that Muslims are not a race. The weird part is that there is a racialization of Muslims that make the attacks on them an identity attack. Where you could have lesser devout forms of Muslims reject certain aspects of Islam, and this isn't much of an issue.
Frankly, it's a similar problem with jews. Jews aren't a race; but most of the rule violating attacks on them treat them as a race.
BRING BACK MY GRILLED CHICKEN SANDWITCH YOU BASTARD
Post Reported for: Rule 11 - Spam
Post Removed: You can't actually make posts about other users. I allow his post up because it's technically a meta-post.
Sigh.
When I say "have to" I mean "have to in order to be in compliance of Rule 16". It's not an order, I'm just explaining to you what the rule is because I like to not hide what the rule means.
After all, the invasive, criminal and exploitative behavior of muslims aligns with the instructions of their warmongering cult-leader. They don't see it as a 'moral failing'
See, that's actually a criticism of the religion, that's why that's okay.
You tried to divert attention from the behavior of muslims by demanding that I criticize their so-called religion. You demanded that I take part in the lie of seperating islam from the muslims when their own "religious" doctrines specifically exhorts upon them to exploit, extort, enslave and exterminate anyone they deem 'infidels', which they have been doing for centuries.
No, I just want you to be clear about the distinction. The reason a Muslim behaves in a morally inferior way is from the institution of the religion, and once outside of that religion, their behavior may return to normal.
Also, stop using chatGPT
I don't use chatGPT (I don't know how). I just sound like this.
If you're that determined to ban all criticism of your mohammedan leash-holders, then make it a clear law. At least then people will know who truly owns you.
So, what you're saying is that you can't claim I'm JIDF now? Hmmmm Intriguing offer, but I'll have to pass. You can criticize Islam all you want.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
This doesn't do that yet. But I can appreciate the frustration of watching this idiot make a Leftist rhetorical attack to validate his own unfalsifiable claim:
"I want to forcibly remove or kill all non-whites. How does this effect you personally? Surely it's because you're not white."