I saw a comment by a guy who said he believes AI specifically gives wrong answers to "people it doesn't like" and right answers to people it likes.

At first, I considered the theory funny but not likely, although...

Anyway, time went on and now I'm starting to wonder...

The first thing that clued me in was I asked AI to produce an image for me a few times and it wouldn't do it, saying what I wanted was not allowed given its programming. Some other people asked the same AI the same thing and got a picture generated.

Okay, maybe just a one-off mistake...

Just now though, I asked 4 different AIs to solve a Sudoku puzzle for me. Every single AI failed. I even corrected its mistakes and asked again. Sometimes, the AI would takes minutes before it came back with a wrong answer. A friend of mine, using the exact same photo, asked her AI to solve the Sudoku puzzle and within 10 seconds it had the right answer.

This makes no sense.

And, it has made me wonder... Do we actually all have a Social Credit Score already and that score determines how well the AI treats us? That might be something that has been programmed in behind the scenes that we aren't aware of yet. Perhaps, that's why the AI founders know they're going to be hated because they know once the switch is switched on and cranked up, it's GG.

Seeing all the non-White accounts posting anti-White ideology on X made me think of this story that I thought was worthy to share.

About 10 years ago during the beginning of the peak of anti-Whitism in Western society when many people did not even understand this was going on, I had moved to a big city in hopes of landing a good job.

I ended up meeting an Asian woman a few years younger than me who had recently moved to the same city for the same reasons. We met through similar social circles and became friends.

I explained to her what was going on with regards to DEI and the anti-White culture in Western societies making it even harder for White men to get good jobs. At first she was sympathetic and agreed with me that it was not good. She was dating a White guy at this time (they later got married) so she had invested interest in seeing White men become successful. However, her now husband inherited $4m from his grandmother and checked out from working. I think he might have bought a golf course and just plays golf everyday so she no longer had that invested interest.

Here's the part I observed that I found interesting. As her career began to take-off and mine was suppressed, she started pushing back on any of what I was saying. She'd start telling me that perhaps I'm just not the best qualified for the job or that I was just using the situation as an excuse for my own lack of competence. I realized what was going on and it was that she didn't want to accept that her success was because she was not-White and/or Asian. She wanted to believe her success was entirely on her own merit not any systemic cultural oppression of White males. Even if she initially believed me, as she started to gain success she couldn't believe me because that would in essence, undermine the success she did have so she felt compelled to believe I was wrong if only to preserve her own ego and belief in her own competence at her success.

This is the inherit sinister nature of the system. Even if non-Whites may agree with White people over the oppression happening in White people's countries, that would mean they would have to admit to their lack of competence and equity in deserving the pay/success they have managed to achieve in White societies thanks to the systemic oppression of White people which would mean both their ego and quality of life would, if we were being fair, be lesser than it is today and this is a self-sacrifice no non-White would ever make (even Whites don't make this self-sacrifice either such as women admitting they displaced many more competent men).

Thus, if you're a White man you can never expect anyone except White men taking your side because the system literally buys-off everyone else to band together against you. This is the sinister nature of the system.

In the end I did end up more successful than her regardless of the obstacles I faced and the red carpets that were rolled out for her so her jabs at my competence and deserving of the situations I faced in the past were proven false; however, it's easy for her to blame "White privilege" if she wanted to for why my success ended up greater than hers (we don't talk anymore).

If you're a White man, the system effectively turns everyone against you.

Most European countries make it illegal to track demographics for census purposes by race. Instead, Europe uses "nationality". In most European countries if you are a German citizen, then you are considered German for census purposes and then people extrapolate from German that they are White but this is false. A Nigerian who immigrates to Germany and has kids with another Nigerian whose kids are considered German will be considered German for all census tracking and thus anyone extrapolating the statistics as German = White will falsibly designate a black person as White.

This happens in every European country.

So, when people say Europe is more White than the USA, they are mistaken.

I used Grok is extrapolate the data since the 1960s looking at immigration data, birth rates, death rates, etc....and it concluded only 80% of Western Europe is White; however, this was a very rudamentary ask with parameters not well set. It seemed to include mixed as White and it used the total birth rate rather than discerning for immigrant birth rate being higher than non-immigrant, etc...

Point is that Western Europe is probably in the 70-80% range for total White population which is actually not much different than the USA. The non-White immigrants to Europe are exceptionally worse quality than the non-White immigrants to the USA.

London is basically 50% White now.

Europeans suggesting their non-White issue isn't as bad as the USA are coping. The USA is taking preventive action now while Europeans leaders want to destroy White people in Europe even further. Without course correction, in a decade, Europe will be worse than the USA.

I'm trying to find a book (I don't know if it exists) that's about tribalism but written with a pro-White and almost instructional tone.

I would like to give the book to some leftists in my family as a Christmas present.

There doesn't seem to be anything new and exciting going on these days.

No fads taking everyone by storm. No new technology everyone is discussing (AI is pretty meh at the moment, especially with the censorship). No new entertainment everyone has to see.

Maybe I'm out of the loop but I don't feel I am. Anyone else kinda feel this way?

I just asked my Gemini Pro to create an Ancient Roman General picture and it refused to do it because it's controversial.

There must be some deep dark realms of the internet where AI isn't so Judaized. What is it?

First part of the process is making an email. Seems simple enough EXCEPT all major free email addresses require you to setup a secondary email to verify your primary email and if you don't, chances are you can't use this email to verify your account for account creations.

This is obviously done in hopes that you link an email that is linked to you in your verification step. This has nothing to do to ensure protection or get rid of automated accounts because it's easy for automation to do this secondary step.

So, you're forced to create two new emails from two different email providers and cross-link them.

Once that's done, you've got to setup your X account which is a nightmare in itself because their new "confirm you aren't a bot" thing is garbage with 10 questions you have to answer. It took me two tries to get it but since I took so long, it didn't properly load when I got it and I was forced to do it two more times to get it. That's answer 40 questions to prove you aren't a robot.

The irony is my X account got banned for being a bot even though I've never used a botting program ever and I don't even use AI to post.

Disclaimer: The purpose of this is actually a two-pronged attack. I want to highlight how absurd the notion of wealth redistribution through the form of taxation is while also highlighting the potential uses for a surveillance control state (which is coming). At the same time, if this took off, I'd benefit from it so meh whatever.

Tenet: Our society recognizes the need to redistribute resources from those who have lots of resources to those who don't have lots of resources. We do this through the form of taxation and social programs. This is down to maximize the utility of the society as a whole because we recognize that a billionaire's happiness won't be impacting by a lack of a few million dollars but an average person's happiness can significantly change with a few million dollars.

Well, sex is a resource. Some say we can't force people to do something with their body (have sex) because that is immoral but people acquire resources through the use of their body (labor) so taxing these resources to redistribute is an exploitation of one's body for the greater good. Exploiting a person's body for sex for the greater good is no different than exploiting a person's body for labor for the greater good.

How I propose we go about implementing the Universal Basic Sex is the following:

• Legalize prostitution by requiring a license to be a prostitute through a formal process.

• Have Palantir with its new AI surveillance system provide an estimated Sexual Market Value score for all citizens from 0-10 with 10 being no problems to access sex with people of their attractiveness or higher and 0 being significant problems (incel level).

• The government creates a new Digital Currency called Sexual Wellbeing Coins. This currency can only be exchanged by prostitutes for real currency by a licensed prostitute and only if their digital wallet shows a transaction from a Sexually Deficient Person (those entitled to receive Sexual Wellbeing Coins).

• People with < 10 scores are all entitled to receive some amount of Sexual Wellbeing Coin depending on their score with 0 receiving the most and those close to 10 receiving the least.

• Sexual Wellbeing Coins in the hands of Sexually Deficient Persons can be exchanged with a licensed prostitute only for sex.

• The objective is to ensure all people in society are entitled to 3 sessions of intercourse a week with someone who meets their level of attraction or better.

From each according to his ability to have sex to each according to his need for sex!

Thoughts on the details of the program and the sales pitch? What are some criticisms?

I really like this girl so I want to help her. In the beginning our relationship was pretty good but I saw signs of some social skills problems. I thought she was just a little socially immature but I chalked that up to other reasons and felt maybe she could improve.

As she got more comfortable with me she actually got significantly worse. I thought she just was naturally not liking me and we weren't compatible but I soon realized she literally hit nearly all the symptoms of autism and not a little, to the max. I would bet my life on her being autistic so I'm not looking for anyone to cast doubt on my diagnosis. She's just good at hiding it as best she can and frankly, I had no prior experience with autism so I wasn't really trained to catch the signs. I don't think her parents are aware either (for various reasons) and she can't keep friends long enough for them to truly understand. I might be the only one with enough perspective to diagnose it. I asked her if she would be willing to go to a psychologist to help with her anxiety issues but she refused because she's scared of them.

Any advice on how to bring this up to her? I'm thinking maybe just tell the mom but I'm not sure the mom will believe me or do anything about it. The dad would be worse.

I was about to just call it quits on our relationship because it's def not working but I do think if she accepts she has autism and works with me it could potentially work. She's given 0 indication she thinks she has autism and she works in social work with disabled people and had training on autism so I suspect she's potentially in denial or scared of accepting it.

Looking for some advice.

I used to read non-stop daily trying to figure our what caused all of this in modernity that we live in when covid hit and this is what I came to after many books (some literally 1000+ pages long).

The facts are verifiable through leftist-approved history and alt-right accepts them as most probable also.

Facts:

• The Catholic Church allowing non-Whites including jewish converts to be Christian
• The Rothschild's manipulated the British stock market at the end of the Napoleonic Wars, which was a large part in why he became so wealthy while also drowning out the competition. They were never punished for this but today it likely would be illegal because of how obviously immoral it is and not in good faith.
• The Rothschild's had connections to the British monarchy because of the lending he made to the monarchy for the Napoleonic Wars and the fact the Rothschilds were relied on to pay soldiers during the war.
• The invention of the printing press
• The promotion of k-12 education through academic institutions
• The change from weapons being easily crafted cheaply by an individual to weapons requiring large quantity of resources requires from the second industrial revolution
• The promotion of anti-racism leading to non-White men being allowed to vote
• The promotion of feminism leading to women's suffrage
• The creation of central banking
• The promotion of income taxes and the welfare state
• Hitler losing WWII along with the peace treaties being signed at the conclusion of the war
• The promotion of Critical Theory that originated from the Frankfurt School
• The immigration act
• The civil rights act
• The promotion of neoliberalism

The above are the main facts that have contributed to where we are today.

The conjecture:

• Ashkenazi Jews gained considerable power over White society. At the height of the Rothchild's influence, it was remarked by many prominent people that the Rothschilds controlled the entire economy of Europe, whereas JP Morgan was given the same regard for the USA. With this influence, jews proceeded to advance their own interests which were not aligned with the interests of White people.
• Part of jewish interests are feminism (Ashkenazi jews are inherently a gynocratic society where the line of succession is based on the woman not the man which is unlike any White society. The esoteric reason for this is that jews are the remnants of a tribe that Whites were ordered by God to kill both the men and women but Whites kept the women alive and ended up procreating with them. The women always held a grudge and kept interbreeding as much among their own sons and daughters as to keep the line as pure as possible and now the existence of jews has been God's punishment to White people for not listening to him and this is why jews are inherently a feminine race). Jews promote these things without necessarily sitting around a round table and discussing the need to (though they do this also) because it's inherent in their nature (genetics) to want these things.
• With the printing press and centralization of knowledge (academic institutions) along with jewish power in finance and with European monarchies, it was easy for them to fill the minds of White people with what was in the interest of jews rather than Whites and essentially subvert White society from existing to secure the prosperity of Whites to existing to secure the prosperity of jews. It was exceptionally easy for the jews to infiltrate the Catholic Church and later the Protestant ones by converting then just promoting their own natural values/beliefs within Christianity and Christians had no defense.
• The significant jewish interest in banking realized with central banking they could gain leverage over most nations so they pushed this
• The advent of the welfare state was designed specifically to both increase government funding to repay higher loans to government, thus empowering the bankers while also appeasing the masses by giving them the bear minimum so they wouldn't revolt
• Individual White men likely realized what was going on but were powerless to stop it because of the change in weapons technology. Men were no longer able to easily rise up against government unlike in the American Revolution times.
• Hitler realized the jewish influence on everything and wanted to free his people of this. He was able to utilize government power and resource management to give White people a good shot at reestablishing dominance over their societies but he failed.
• After the war, the obvious topic on jewish minds was preventing White people from ever doing what they tried to do before and revenge. Much of the modern leftism can be chalked up to this. Prior to Hitler, the jews may have been content just siphoning all the wealth from Whites and keeping society serving them but after the war prominent jews switched to an "we need to oppress Whites and maybe even eradicate them so they never rise up" plan of action.
• Critical Theory was utilized as a weapon to oppress Whites
• Neoliberliam was used as a weapon to make all nations reliant on the jewish economic system without self-reliance and sovereignty
• The Civil Rights and Immigration acts were used to oppress and eradicate Whites
• Not all jews agree on how to treat Whites. Some jews think their wealth will decrease if Whites are eliminated and they need White slaves to improve their station while other jews and their allies think Whites are too big a threat to keep around. Some are in the middle believing that with the advances in AI surveillance (Palantir) that the threat of Whites rebelling against jewish dominance can be controlled and it's different than last time (this is where Trump/Vance's team stands). Of course, everyone's beliefs in the ruling elite slightly differ in these regards with some not even realizing they're supporting these pathways.

This is essentially where we stand today

The Catholic Church since its foundation has made errors that have now led to harming Whites but ultimately, I would say the beginning to the problems today truly begin from about ~1800 onward.

To get good at AI, you have to give it instructions and they have to be clear. You have to dictate to it or order it around. It's the complete reversal of our service industry type work (and boss/peon) of society right now where most people are "order-takers". Being an order-taker is a submissive role where you don't want to upset the person you're taking orders from. It leads to a social adaptation of meekness.

AI will flip this. We're going to start getting people who want to dictate everything to others. Guys are going to start joking with their GFs: GF AI, I want you to prepare a hot meal for me using the leftover pork in the fridge, and any of the other ingredients we have in the house. This sort of "ordering people" around like people order AI will condition people to be directors rather than order-takers.

It's going to condition people to give orders rather than receive orders.

IMO, this will have an unintended POSITIVE consequence because it'll create a new generation of people who don't want to be slaves to the masters so to speak because they're used to giving orders around. It might lead to a more adversarial culture which could reverse the "non-violence" issue we have today that had led to our current high volume of subservience to the state.

Or Hitler started WWII? Both were "preemptive strikes". Or will pro-Israel people admit that Israel started this and they're the aggressor?

Obviously, pro-Israel people will say Iran was asking for it but that's the same argument pro-Russian and pro-Hitler people use.

This attack should be adequate proof that "who started what" really doesn't matter. I never thought it mattered but I hope everyone else sees that it doesn't matter.

I decided to read both these book after Carney was elected PM and I finally finished them both.

Carney's books is 100% propaganda. I have a major in finance and I mastered in statistics with a financial focus from a top 100 university, so I understand everything he's talking about. I work in banking and have for over a decade. All my option courses outside of finance were economics courses.

Carney literally cites Karl Marx more than any other person in his book. He frames so many economics/finance topics in a completely unfair way to make his ideas sound better. He sets up so many strawmans in his book it starts to get difficult to stomach at some points. His book was total trash. I learned absolutely nothing from it except how fucked Canada is.

Trump's book on the other hand is absolute gold. It's funny, there's actually a lot of good content to learn from. I happen to do loans for large apartment complex developments ($30m+) right now and everything Trump talks about is very real and the way he handles it is ingenuous at times. Just learning about some of the negotiations he conducted with the city and banks is illuminating. His advice is sound. Also, I can confirm based on my experience everything he says he feasible and true. It makes sense. It's the complete opposite of Carney's book.

I read Carney's book and I felt like I needed to take a cold shower to get rid of all the dirt that was in this book. It felt like lie after lie after lie and misrepresentation after misrepresentation. I felt dirty reading it. It's written at a high enough level that to a layman, they wouldn't pickup on everything Carney is misrepresenting but to the layman, it'll sound smart. Trump never wrote his book this pretentious and it's easy for anyone to follow but I can confirm given my experience that everything Trump discusses is 100% plausible and I can't say it isn't true because it sounds pretty true from what I know and I experience in his industry.

When I finished Trump's book, I actually learned a lot and I'll probably take a lot of what Trump said to heart and practice some of it in my industry. It's a useful book. I've read other books like How to Win Friends and Influence people but I'd consider Trump's book far more pertinent to the modern day than Carnegie's book, especially if you're in real estate development or any sort of business that requires negotiating with people and dealing with the government.

I think there's some lying involved here. I think the lying is actually systemic and all Western countries are lying about the numbers or there's something else going on here that isn't obviously apparent.

Supposedly, Canada's GDP Per Capita PPP Adjusted went from $50,499 in 2019 to $48,591 in 2020. This is explained by COVID and up until this point, the numbers seem to align with expectations (or at least they were consistent long enough without discrepancies to indicate any falsification).

Somehow Canada's GDP Per Capita PPP Adjusted went from $48,591 in 2020 to $63,525 in 2023 a growth of 30.73% in 3 years? That's after shutdowns, the most debt ever taken on as a percentage of GDP by any first world nation and that debt was given to people to sit at home and do nothing.

From 2008 to 2020, Canada's GDP Per Capita PPP Adjusted went from $40,376 to $48,591, a growth of 20% over 12 years but I'm expected to believe Canada grew post covid by 30% over 3 years? Yes, I'm taking data from peaks and lows but even averaged out they don't make sense.

All Western countries supposedly saw something very similar and are all now reporting incredible economies post covid when hardly any of them were showing good growth up until COVID.

During COVID, the lack of growth over the last decade was promoted to people as proof that DEI and leftist values of the 2010s era was hampering development. However, all of a sudden all Western economies are showing phenomenal economic strength that just wasn't there before.

Something is going on here, imo. I think governments and international organization are straight up lying in order to hide how poorly these leftist values truly were.

After COVID in Canada everyone's salary stayed the same but costs went way up. No one is better off as far as I know and a lot of people are worse off but somehow our economy is 30% better. I don't believe it. SOUND THE ALARM

Furthermore, there's more lying going on. The GINI coefficient measures income/wealth inequality with high values being more unequal. Supposedly Canada's inequality was 0.317 in 2019 and in 2022 (2023 wasn't available) it was 0.300 showing inequality reduced yet we all know during COVID small businesses got completely hammered and forced to shutdown while mega corps like Amazon and other large businesses were able to stay open and made all the money.

So, not only am I supposed to believe our economy grew 30% over 3 years but it was dispersed in a more equal manner bringing inequality down?

The international organizations and governments are straight up lying about their macroeconomic numbers. Nothing seems to properly align. There was nothing in the last few years that warrants such growth for Canada or the USA or Europe. Interest rates are higher and debt is drying up...

The only potential argument I can maybe get behind is some sort of economies of scale where because all the mom and pop shops closed down and got gobbled up by the big corps, they were able to be more productive BUT Canada's labor productivity was $56.6 in 2012 dollars in 2019 and $57.60 in 2022 which seems immaterial of a change. 2023 numbers unavailable.

Canada's population also grew from 37.6m in 2019 to 40.1m in 2023 and our economy per capita grew 30% adjusted to purchasing power? There's no fucking way.

The numbers are a lie.