Haven't heard much about it in a while. My boss at work keeps telling us to use AI to do things AI isn't capable of doing without so many errors it takes more time to review the AI output than to just do it myself.

I noticed a lot of AI datacenters that were talked about mostly all stalled.

What's the current situation on AI?

No one seems to be talking about this situation going on but it's going on.

I've used VPNs for about a decade now for all my browsing both on my phone and home computer. The amount of counter measures I've seen against VPNs in the last year has grown astronomically. It has quite obviously become a target by big tech companies and government but instead of banning VPNs, it appears the strategy they're going for is to make them so unwieldy to use that people voluntarily stop using them or just don't start. It's coercion, similar to what we saw during COVID to force vaccines.

5 years ago, you could access the whole internet with a VPN without issues. Now, every website you go to it seems wants you to confirm you're human which can take a few seconds or a few minutes depending (significantly interrupting your browsing experience). Furthermore, many websites straight up don't even work with a VPN either.

The Judeo-Establishment will tell you this is needed to stop hackers and bots but this isn't true at all because sophisticated hacker/scamming groups have so many other ways to secure themselves. It's only the average person in the public who is being harmed which means they're the true targets. The government wants everyone's data and they aren't going to let VPNs stop them.

We should honestly make it a law for any organization to discriminate against connections from people using a VPN and those who aren't.

The reason I ask is because I've noticed the quality of food at restaurants keeps going downhill as more and more immigrants get get brought in to work at these restaurants (especially Indians). I've been avoiding eating out because of it but now all the grocery stores have Indians handling the food I'm buying there. I also know that most food processing before it even gets to the grocery stores is done by immigrants with the quality of those immigrants likely decreasing over time (especially the last 10 years in Canada). There's no way rich people are poisoning their own food... so where are they buying their food from?

Do you think there's like a special rich person farm collective where certain farms produce food specifically for the rich elite only? Or could major food conglomerates also have a rich-person food processing division? Maybe, it's their Kosher division, etc... Anyone know?

The monsters and Dungeons and Dragons were the least cringey thing about the TV Series.

1. All the White families were shown with deadbeat husbands
2. The black family was the only "normal" family
3. All the women, little girl characters were portrayed as sassy, strong, adversarial, no anxiety and always handling social situations better than the men
4. All the men are portrayed as assholes or beta cucks.
5. All the little boy characters were nerdy and socially awkward but all the little girl characters weren't but they were portrayed as smarter or superior to the little boys.
6. The most powerful person is a little girl.
7. They throw in a jewish wise guy archetype to give relationship advice to the White people
8. The black little kid gets the red head with blue eyes girl
9. Guys can't aim when shooting guns but women are accurate on their first shot.
10. Wayyyyy too much time focused on child relationships. Felt like I was watching Cuties 2: A Love Story or something
11. Completely and utterly unrealistic female dialogue that would never happen irl
12. Little kids with way too much knowledge than they ought to have that doesn't actually add to the story
13. Did I mention all the male characters felt like their balls had been cut off?
14. Oh, can't forget the entirely unrealistic lesbian character who definitely wouldn't have sex with a man because lesbians like her aren't like that. Sure, sure.

I just hope Zoomers and whatever the new generation is growing up doesn't fall for this. Nothing displayed in this TV series even comes close to accurately portraying how anyone or anything is like irl. The monsters being real is more believable than the characters.

Edit - One thing I thought of that I always find fascinating about woke propaganda is that the main characters are "rebels" that don't conform to the "mainstream narrative". There's even a scene where they visit a jewish conspiracy theorist to disseminate proof of stuff most people wouldn't believe so they decide to water it down and release it to the public so people would believe it. Every character in the show is even ordered by the government not to speak the truth so they know the news media is lying to everyone the whole time. Why is it then that the biggest woke adherents are also the biggest conformists who fully believe everything in the media? I guess the idea is that "that only happens in TV shows" and they don't realize it happens irl too because they trust the system. They can correctly discern fantasy from reality when the fantasy suggests reality isn't how they want reality to be and then they can't correctly discern reality from fantasy when the fantasy is how they wish reality was.

Prior to AI, I had done a lot of research into the dating stats and made some pretty bleak posts on ConPro about it. Now, we have AI (Germini Pro) so I got the AI to do the heavy lifting for me this time.

The estimated number of women in the USA who are White, single, between the ages of 18-25yo, don't have children, are not overweight, do not have herpes-2, have had 0-3 previous sexual partners, consider themselves right-wing politically and don't have visible tattoos in casual clothes is 150,000. That's 150,000 in the whole country.

If you live in a city with 1m people, there's on average about 440 women living in this city who meet this standard.

On the other hand the number of single men who are aged 18-35 is about 25m.

That means in a city of 1m there's about 73,500 men you're competing against for this kind of woman, of which, there are only 440.

You need to be in the top 0.05% of men if this is what you're after.

What makes you think you're in the top 0.05% of men?

Of course your own preferences, the preferences of the women and preferences of the men you're competing against matter to a degree but something tells me even when that's factored in, you're still scraping from the bottom.

If we just compare the number of single women without kids who are aged 18-35 (16.5m vs single men (25m) you still need to be in the top 66% of all these men to even have a shot at the loweat quality woman.

Now imagine being a man with standards. If you have standards, you better be in the top 0.1% of men or you don't stand a chance.

I really get the feeling that the economy is being artificially propped up at the moment and the key event I suspect they're being propped up for is the midterm elections. Post election, I feel like the cracks will start to show and we'll start to get a correction which will lead to a crash, similar in size to 2008.

That's just my feeling and it isn't necessarily backed on too much but significant amounts of resources have been poured into "AI" and I really don't feel the payoffs are going to pan out. Once that becomes the mainstream view, everything built around it crumbles.

I saw a comment by a guy who said he believes AI specifically gives wrong answers to "people it doesn't like" and right answers to people it likes.

At first, I considered the theory funny but not likely, although...

Anyway, time went on and now I'm starting to wonder...

The first thing that clued me in was I asked AI to produce an image for me a few times and it wouldn't do it, saying what I wanted was not allowed given its programming. Some other people asked the same AI the same thing and got a picture generated.

Okay, maybe just a one-off mistake...

Just now though, I asked 4 different AIs to solve a Sudoku puzzle for me. Every single AI failed. I even corrected its mistakes and asked again. Sometimes, the AI would takes minutes before it came back with a wrong answer. A friend of mine, using the exact same photo, asked her AI to solve the Sudoku puzzle and within 10 seconds it had the right answer.

This makes no sense.

And, it has made me wonder... Do we actually all have a Social Credit Score already and that score determines how well the AI treats us? That might be something that has been programmed in behind the scenes that we aren't aware of yet. Perhaps, that's why the AI founders know they're going to be hated because they know once the switch is switched on and cranked up, it's GG.

Seeing all the non-White accounts posting anti-White ideology on X made me think of this story that I thought was worthy to share.

About 10 years ago during the beginning of the peak of anti-Whitism in Western society when many people did not even understand this was going on, I had moved to a big city in hopes of landing a good job.

I ended up meeting an Asian woman a few years younger than me who had recently moved to the same city for the same reasons. We met through similar social circles and became friends.

I explained to her what was going on with regards to DEI and the anti-White culture in Western societies making it even harder for White men to get good jobs. At first she was sympathetic and agreed with me that it was not good. She was dating a White guy at this time (they later got married) so she had invested interest in seeing White men become successful. However, her now husband inherited $4m from his grandmother and checked out from working. I think he might have bought a golf course and just plays golf everyday so she no longer had that invested interest.

Here's the part I observed that I found interesting. As her career began to take-off and mine was suppressed, she started pushing back on any of what I was saying. She'd start telling me that perhaps I'm just not the best qualified for the job or that I was just using the situation as an excuse for my own lack of competence. I realized what was going on and it was that she didn't want to accept that her success was because she was not-White and/or Asian. She wanted to believe her success was entirely on her own merit not any systemic cultural oppression of White males. Even if she initially believed me, as she started to gain success she couldn't believe me because that would in essence, undermine the success she did have so she felt compelled to believe I was wrong if only to preserve her own ego and belief in her own competence at her success.

This is the inherit sinister nature of the system. Even if non-Whites may agree with White people over the oppression happening in White people's countries, that would mean they would have to admit to their lack of competence and equity in deserving the pay/success they have managed to achieve in White societies thanks to the systemic oppression of White people which would mean both their ego and quality of life would, if we were being fair, be lesser than it is today and this is a self-sacrifice no non-White would ever make (even Whites don't make this self-sacrifice either such as women admitting they displaced many more competent men).

Thus, if you're a White man you can never expect anyone except White men taking your side because the system literally buys-off everyone else to band together against you. This is the sinister nature of the system.

In the end I did end up more successful than her regardless of the obstacles I faced and the red carpets that were rolled out for her so her jabs at my competence and deserving of the situations I faced in the past were proven false; however, it's easy for her to blame "White privilege" if she wanted to for why my success ended up greater than hers (we don't talk anymore).

If you're a White man, the system effectively turns everyone against you.

Most European countries make it illegal to track demographics for census purposes by race. Instead, Europe uses "nationality". In most European countries if you are a German citizen, then you are considered German for census purposes and then people extrapolate from German that they are White but this is false. A Nigerian who immigrates to Germany and has kids with another Nigerian whose kids are considered German will be considered German for all census tracking and thus anyone extrapolating the statistics as German = White will falsibly designate a black person as White.

This happens in every European country.

So, when people say Europe is more White than the USA, they are mistaken.

I used Grok is extrapolate the data since the 1960s looking at immigration data, birth rates, death rates, etc....and it concluded only 80% of Western Europe is White; however, this was a very rudamentary ask with parameters not well set. It seemed to include mixed as White and it used the total birth rate rather than discerning for immigrant birth rate being higher than non-immigrant, etc...

Point is that Western Europe is probably in the 70-80% range for total White population which is actually not much different than the USA. The non-White immigrants to Europe are exceptionally worse quality than the non-White immigrants to the USA.

London is basically 50% White now.

Europeans suggesting their non-White issue isn't as bad as the USA are coping. The USA is taking preventive action now while Europeans leaders want to destroy White people in Europe even further. Without course correction, in a decade, Europe will be worse than the USA.

I'm trying to find a book (I don't know if it exists) that's about tribalism but written with a pro-White and almost instructional tone.

I would like to give the book to some leftists in my family as a Christmas present.

There doesn't seem to be anything new and exciting going on these days.

No fads taking everyone by storm. No new technology everyone is discussing (AI is pretty meh at the moment, especially with the censorship). No new entertainment everyone has to see.

Maybe I'm out of the loop but I don't feel I am. Anyone else kinda feel this way?

I just asked my Gemini Pro to create an Ancient Roman General picture and it refused to do it because it's controversial.

There must be some deep dark realms of the internet where AI isn't so Judaized. What is it?

First part of the process is making an email. Seems simple enough EXCEPT all major free email addresses require you to setup a secondary email to verify your primary email and if you don't, chances are you can't use this email to verify your account for account creations.

This is obviously done in hopes that you link an email that is linked to you in your verification step. This has nothing to do to ensure protection or get rid of automated accounts because it's easy for automation to do this secondary step.

So, you're forced to create two new emails from two different email providers and cross-link them.

Once that's done, you've got to setup your X account which is a nightmare in itself because their new "confirm you aren't a bot" thing is garbage with 10 questions you have to answer. It took me two tries to get it but since I took so long, it didn't properly load when I got it and I was forced to do it two more times to get it. That's answer 40 questions to prove you aren't a robot.

The irony is my X account got banned for being a bot even though I've never used a botting program ever and I don't even use AI to post.

Disclaimer: The purpose of this is actually a two-pronged attack. I want to highlight how absurd the notion of wealth redistribution through the form of taxation is while also highlighting the potential uses for a surveillance control state (which is coming). At the same time, if this took off, I'd benefit from it so meh whatever.

Tenet: Our society recognizes the need to redistribute resources from those who have lots of resources to those who don't have lots of resources. We do this through the form of taxation and social programs. This is down to maximize the utility of the society as a whole because we recognize that a billionaire's happiness won't be impacting by a lack of a few million dollars but an average person's happiness can significantly change with a few million dollars.

Well, sex is a resource. Some say we can't force people to do something with their body (have sex) because that is immoral but people acquire resources through the use of their body (labor) so taxing these resources to redistribute is an exploitation of one's body for the greater good. Exploiting a person's body for sex for the greater good is no different than exploiting a person's body for labor for the greater good.

How I propose we go about implementing the Universal Basic Sex is the following:

• Legalize prostitution by requiring a license to be a prostitute through a formal process.

• Have Palantir with its new AI surveillance system provide an estimated Sexual Market Value score for all citizens from 0-10 with 10 being no problems to access sex with people of their attractiveness or higher and 0 being significant problems (incel level).

• The government creates a new Digital Currency called Sexual Wellbeing Coins. This currency can only be exchanged by prostitutes for real currency by a licensed prostitute and only if their digital wallet shows a transaction from a Sexually Deficient Person (those entitled to receive Sexual Wellbeing Coins).

• People with < 10 scores are all entitled to receive some amount of Sexual Wellbeing Coin depending on their score with 0 receiving the most and those close to 10 receiving the least.

• Sexual Wellbeing Coins in the hands of Sexually Deficient Persons can be exchanged with a licensed prostitute only for sex.

• The objective is to ensure all people in society are entitled to 3 sessions of intercourse a week with someone who meets their level of attraction or better.

From each according to his ability to have sex to each according to his need for sex!

Thoughts on the details of the program and the sales pitch? What are some criticisms?

I really like this girl so I want to help her. In the beginning our relationship was pretty good but I saw signs of some social skills problems. I thought she was just a little socially immature but I chalked that up to other reasons and felt maybe she could improve.

As she got more comfortable with me she actually got significantly worse. I thought she just was naturally not liking me and we weren't compatible but I soon realized she literally hit nearly all the symptoms of autism and not a little, to the max. I would bet my life on her being autistic so I'm not looking for anyone to cast doubt on my diagnosis. She's just good at hiding it as best she can and frankly, I had no prior experience with autism so I wasn't really trained to catch the signs. I don't think her parents are aware either (for various reasons) and she can't keep friends long enough for them to truly understand. I might be the only one with enough perspective to diagnose it. I asked her if she would be willing to go to a psychologist to help with her anxiety issues but she refused because she's scared of them.

Any advice on how to bring this up to her? I'm thinking maybe just tell the mom but I'm not sure the mom will believe me or do anything about it. The dad would be worse.

I was about to just call it quits on our relationship because it's def not working but I do think if she accepts she has autism and works with me it could potentially work. She's given 0 indication she thinks she has autism and she works in social work with disabled people and had training on autism so I suspect she's potentially in denial or scared of accepting it.

Looking for some advice.

I used to read non-stop daily trying to figure our what caused all of this in modernity that we live in when covid hit and this is what I came to after many books (some literally 1000+ pages long).

The facts are verifiable through leftist-approved history and alt-right accepts them as most probable also.

Facts:

• The Catholic Church allowing non-Whites including jewish converts to be Christian
• The Rothschild's manipulated the British stock market at the end of the Napoleonic Wars, which was a large part in why he became so wealthy while also drowning out the competition. They were never punished for this but today it likely would be illegal because of how obviously immoral it is and not in good faith.
• The Rothschild's had connections to the British monarchy because of the lending he made to the monarchy for the Napoleonic Wars and the fact the Rothschilds were relied on to pay soldiers during the war.
• The invention of the printing press
• The promotion of k-12 education through academic institutions
• The change from weapons being easily crafted cheaply by an individual to weapons requiring large quantity of resources requires from the second industrial revolution
• The promotion of anti-racism leading to non-White men being allowed to vote
• The promotion of feminism leading to women's suffrage
• The creation of central banking
• The promotion of income taxes and the welfare state
• Hitler losing WWII along with the peace treaties being signed at the conclusion of the war
• The promotion of Critical Theory that originated from the Frankfurt School
• The immigration act
• The civil rights act
• The promotion of neoliberalism

The above are the main facts that have contributed to where we are today.

The conjecture:

• Ashkenazi Jews gained considerable power over White society. At the height of the Rothchild's influence, it was remarked by many prominent people that the Rothschilds controlled the entire economy of Europe, whereas JP Morgan was given the same regard for the USA. With this influence, jews proceeded to advance their own interests which were not aligned with the interests of White people.
• Part of jewish interests are feminism (Ashkenazi jews are inherently a gynocratic society where the line of succession is based on the woman not the man which is unlike any White society. The esoteric reason for this is that jews are the remnants of a tribe that Whites were ordered by God to kill both the men and women but Whites kept the women alive and ended up procreating with them. The women always held a grudge and kept interbreeding as much among their own sons and daughters as to keep the line as pure as possible and now the existence of jews has been God's punishment to White people for not listening to him and this is why jews are inherently a feminine race). Jews promote these things without necessarily sitting around a round table and discussing the need to (though they do this also) because it's inherent in their nature (genetics) to want these things.
• With the printing press and centralization of knowledge (academic institutions) along with jewish power in finance and with European monarchies, it was easy for them to fill the minds of White people with what was in the interest of jews rather than Whites and essentially subvert White society from existing to secure the prosperity of Whites to existing to secure the prosperity of jews. It was exceptionally easy for the jews to infiltrate the Catholic Church and later the Protestant ones by converting then just promoting their own natural values/beliefs within Christianity and Christians had no defense.
• The significant jewish interest in banking realized with central banking they could gain leverage over most nations so they pushed this
• The advent of the welfare state was designed specifically to both increase government funding to repay higher loans to government, thus empowering the bankers while also appeasing the masses by giving them the bear minimum so they wouldn't revolt
• Individual White men likely realized what was going on but were powerless to stop it because of the change in weapons technology. Men were no longer able to easily rise up against government unlike in the American Revolution times.
• Hitler realized the jewish influence on everything and wanted to free his people of this. He was able to utilize government power and resource management to give White people a good shot at reestablishing dominance over their societies but he failed.
• After the war, the obvious topic on jewish minds was preventing White people from ever doing what they tried to do before and revenge. Much of the modern leftism can be chalked up to this. Prior to Hitler, the jews may have been content just siphoning all the wealth from Whites and keeping society serving them but after the war prominent jews switched to an "we need to oppress Whites and maybe even eradicate them so they never rise up" plan of action.
• Critical Theory was utilized as a weapon to oppress Whites
• Neoliberliam was used as a weapon to make all nations reliant on the jewish economic system without self-reliance and sovereignty
• The Civil Rights and Immigration acts were used to oppress and eradicate Whites
• Not all jews agree on how to treat Whites. Some jews think their wealth will decrease if Whites are eliminated and they need White slaves to improve their station while other jews and their allies think Whites are too big a threat to keep around. Some are in the middle believing that with the advances in AI surveillance (Palantir) that the threat of Whites rebelling against jewish dominance can be controlled and it's different than last time (this is where Trump/Vance's team stands). Of course, everyone's beliefs in the ruling elite slightly differ in these regards with some not even realizing they're supporting these pathways.

This is essentially where we stand today

The Catholic Church since its foundation has made errors that have now led to harming Whites but ultimately, I would say the beginning to the problems today truly begin from about ~1800 onward.

To get good at AI, you have to give it instructions and they have to be clear. You have to dictate to it or order it around. It's the complete reversal of our service industry type work (and boss/peon) of society right now where most people are "order-takers". Being an order-taker is a submissive role where you don't want to upset the person you're taking orders from. It leads to a social adaptation of meekness.

AI will flip this. We're going to start getting people who want to dictate everything to others. Guys are going to start joking with their GFs: GF AI, I want you to prepare a hot meal for me using the leftover pork in the fridge, and any of the other ingredients we have in the house. This sort of "ordering people" around like people order AI will condition people to be directors rather than order-takers.

It's going to condition people to give orders rather than receive orders.

IMO, this will have an unintended POSITIVE consequence because it'll create a new generation of people who don't want to be slaves to the masters so to speak because they're used to giving orders around. It might lead to a more adversarial culture which could reverse the "non-violence" issue we have today that had led to our current high volume of subservience to the state.

Or Hitler started WWII? Both were "preemptive strikes". Or will pro-Israel people admit that Israel started this and they're the aggressor?

Obviously, pro-Israel people will say Iran was asking for it but that's the same argument pro-Russian and pro-Hitler people use.

This attack should be adequate proof that "who started what" really doesn't matter. I never thought it mattered but I hope everyone else sees that it doesn't matter.

I decided to read both these book after Carney was elected PM and I finally finished them both.

Carney's books is 100% propaganda. I have a major in finance and I mastered in statistics with a financial focus from a top 100 university, so I understand everything he's talking about. I work in banking and have for over a decade. All my option courses outside of finance were economics courses.

Carney literally cites Karl Marx more than any other person in his book. He frames so many economics/finance topics in a completely unfair way to make his ideas sound better. He sets up so many strawmans in his book it starts to get difficult to stomach at some points. His book was total trash. I learned absolutely nothing from it except how fucked Canada is.

Trump's book on the other hand is absolute gold. It's funny, there's actually a lot of good content to learn from. I happen to do loans for large apartment complex developments ($30m+) right now and everything Trump talks about is very real and the way he handles it is ingenuous at times. Just learning about some of the negotiations he conducted with the city and banks is illuminating. His advice is sound. Also, I can confirm based on my experience everything he says he feasible and true. It makes sense. It's the complete opposite of Carney's book.

I read Carney's book and I felt like I needed to take a cold shower to get rid of all the dirt that was in this book. It felt like lie after lie after lie and misrepresentation after misrepresentation. I felt dirty reading it. It's written at a high enough level that to a layman, they wouldn't pickup on everything Carney is misrepresenting but to the layman, it'll sound smart. Trump never wrote his book this pretentious and it's easy for anyone to follow but I can confirm given my experience that everything Trump discusses is 100% plausible and I can't say it isn't true because it sounds pretty true from what I know and I experience in his industry.

When I finished Trump's book, I actually learned a lot and I'll probably take a lot of what Trump said to heart and practice some of it in my industry. It's a useful book. I've read other books like How to Win Friends and Influence people but I'd consider Trump's book far more pertinent to the modern day than Carnegie's book, especially if you're in real estate development or any sort of business that requires negotiating with people and dealing with the government.