I have already said that the globalist elites consist of various groups such as Catholics, Brahmin Indians and CCP Chinese and Jews are disproportionately represented among this group
okay sure, I agree, and I didn't mean to bark up the wrong tree.
yet you've got people here who only ever mention the Jews, and don't seem to realize that it's on a similar level of ridiculous as always trying to frame everything as being about women. I certainly don't see the rest of the groups you mentioned (even the Chinese) singled out as much, and that just doesn't seem right to me. I think they should all be called out for being profiteers, race baiters or just plain old cucks.
it's just way too convenient (and disingenuous) to excuse women and make it only about Jewish women. it's such a fucking cop out. yeah Jewish women statistically deserve more blame. sure, I agree. does that mean we should be ignoring the "women" angle in favor of the more convenient "Jewish" angle? no, that's dishonest. in Feminism's case for example it's clearly a "women" issue and a "Jewish" issue.
I want every single globalist held responsible for the evils they perpetrated on the populace.
Blaming only one singular group doesn't capture every fucking piece of filth who is involved in this leviathan.
I just won't lie and say that every group is equally responsible from a statistical standpoint. Some groups just have much more disproportionate representation.
Is it Taiwanese or Hong Kong individuals who generally try to push globalist agendas? No it is often always the CCP Chinese individuals.
Look at Indians. Not all Indians try to push globalist agendas. No it is almost always Brahmin Indian individuals who try to do this shit.
Among the Jews, it is almost always the leftist wealthy Jews who are involved in pushing globalism.
In terms of white people it is generally leftist white women who are involved in pushing globalism.
Trends exist for which individuals are likely to be globalist. That doesn't mean every member of any ethnic group is guilty. It just means there are more bad apples from certain barrels. That shouldn't be controversial to point out.
Nicely put, and that just about matches my world view. Good to know that we agree.
I only take offense with people who seem to always single out a specific group. I think it's a cop out. Like in this thread for example, it sure is convenient to shift the blame to only Jewish women because white women are 50% of whites, while Jewish women are 0% of whites. So hey, now it's no longer "your" problem.
...not that it was "your" problem in the first place: that's a trap. It's just the cancer of identity politics that makes people reflexively protect their in-group instead of singling out the individuals who are destroying their culture, including these from said in-group. Now sure, if we take this invidiualistic approach too far and ignore statistics about populations, than that's even more harmful. Just... let's try and find some happy medium.
Let's try a hypothetical, and look at it from a place outside of altruism and empathy.
In our hypothetical, we have a form of energy production that is responsible for 13% of power, but 56% of pollution. Now, the other 87% of energy production also produces pollution, but with a far greater power:pollution ratio. Let's say your goal is to reduce pollution. Do you target that 13% that is responsible for over half the pollution, or do you target the entire energy sector equally?
okay sure, I agree, and I didn't mean to bark up the wrong tree.
yet you've got people here who only ever mention the Jews, and don't seem to realize that it's on a similar level of ridiculous as always trying to frame everything as being about women. I certainly don't see the rest of the groups you mentioned (even the Chinese) singled out as much, and that just doesn't seem right to me. I think they should all be called out for being profiteers, race baiters or just plain old cucks.
it's just way too convenient (and disingenuous) to excuse women and make it only about Jewish women. it's such a fucking cop out. yeah Jewish women statistically deserve more blame. sure, I agree. does that mean we should be ignoring the "women" angle in favor of the more convenient "Jewish" angle? no, that's dishonest. in Feminism's case for example it's clearly a "women" issue and a "Jewish" issue.
I want every single globalist held responsible for the evils they perpetrated on the populace.
Blaming only one singular group doesn't capture every fucking piece of filth who is involved in this leviathan.
I just won't lie and say that every group is equally responsible from a statistical standpoint. Some groups just have much more disproportionate representation.
Is it Taiwanese or Hong Kong individuals who generally try to push globalist agendas? No it is often always the CCP Chinese individuals.
Look at Indians. Not all Indians try to push globalist agendas. No it is almost always Brahmin Indian individuals who try to do this shit.
Among the Jews, it is almost always the leftist wealthy Jews who are involved in pushing globalism.
In terms of white people it is generally leftist white women who are involved in pushing globalism.
Trends exist for which individuals are likely to be globalist. That doesn't mean every member of any ethnic group is guilty. It just means there are more bad apples from certain barrels. That shouldn't be controversial to point out.
Nicely put, and that just about matches my world view. Good to know that we agree.
I only take offense with people who seem to always single out a specific group. I think it's a cop out. Like in this thread for example, it sure is convenient to shift the blame to only Jewish women because white women are 50% of whites, while Jewish women are 0% of whites. So hey, now it's no longer "your" problem.
...not that it was "your" problem in the first place: that's a trap. It's just the cancer of identity politics that makes people reflexively protect their in-group instead of singling out the individuals who are destroying their culture, including these from said in-group. Now sure, if we take this invidiualistic approach too far and ignore statistics about populations, than that's even more harmful. Just... let's try and find some happy medium.
Let's try a hypothetical, and look at it from a place outside of altruism and empathy.
In our hypothetical, we have a form of energy production that is responsible for 13% of power, but 56% of pollution. Now, the other 87% of energy production also produces pollution, but with a far greater power:pollution ratio. Let's say your goal is to reduce pollution. Do you target that 13% that is responsible for over half the pollution, or do you target the entire energy sector equally?
Where in my comments did get that I'm against using empirical data about populations? I said the exact opposite.