Because green parties exist entirely to promote the bidding of their masters. They're used to capture the focus and attention of all the stupid environmentalists and trend slaves to misdirect away from actually useful environmentalism.
If any of them really wanted a healthy, self-sufficient future they'd be doing nothing but nonstop advocacy for nuclear power. Instead they're doing the opposite.
Imagine society deciding to ban air travel after the first two plane crashes in aviation history occurred instead of trying to improve aircraft design and air travel processes to make it safer.
Chernobyl was both a bad design and the ultimate result of communists shirking responsibility.
Fukushima was the unfortunate result of the company that built it ignoring the designer's safety feature specifications and cutting all kinds of corners.
Coalition and swing votes. Typically align themselves with other less egregious left wing parties like Labour in order to bribe their bills in with underhanded deals - i.e. Well have our seats vote yes to push through your new Law but we want X in return"
What is it with green parties and having no power whatsoever, yet being treated like a major influence?
Because green parties exist entirely to promote the bidding of their masters. They're used to capture the focus and attention of all the stupid environmentalists and trend slaves to misdirect away from actually useful environmentalism.
If any of them really wanted a healthy, self-sufficient future they'd be doing nothing but nonstop advocacy for nuclear power. Instead they're doing the opposite.
Did ya never wonder why?
The old leader of the Greens was a crazy cat lady, I'm talking believing more conspiracy theories than Alex Jones.
But the media covered for her, in fact treated her like some elder statesman, some wise old sage.
Here's a collection of her craziness the MSM covers up or minimizes: https://jjmccullough.com/elizabethmay.html
Chernobyl, Fukushima...
Imagine society deciding to ban air travel after the first two plane crashes in aviation history occurred instead of trying to improve aircraft design and air travel processes to make it safer.
Show me a plane crash that made the area it happened unlivable for decades.
Chernobyl was both a bad design and the ultimate result of communists shirking responsibility.
Fukushima was the unfortunate result of the company that built it ignoring the designer's safety feature specifications and cutting all kinds of corners.
I'm guessing they are trying to make it appear popular to attract more votes to it. Most likely it will work.
Coalition and swing votes. Typically align themselves with other less egregious left wing parties like Labour in order to bribe their bills in with underhanded deals - i.e. Well have our seats vote yes to push through your new Law but we want X in return"