Ahh, but the type of equality they're after seems to be a moratorium on shooting black people - for any reason, even if it's a legal reason - until the number of white people who've been shot catches up.
Unless they are arrested, they will riot until no more black people are shot by police.
It's the same type of terrorism that led to the current attitude over hate speech. Physically attack anyone over saying "nigger" and have society at large give a pass for the physical assault. Other races will rarely attack you outright for saying "cracker", "gook", "chink", "kike", etc.
Once the concept of violent retaliation has been established, the next step is to establish the narrative that the word itself is causing the violence, not the free will of the individual responding to the word. This is where "speech is violence" comes from.
Now you see why the riots are happening. "Race blind policing is racial violence" is the ultimate goal.
They say equality. They mean what they call equity (aka equality of outcome). For example, 13.4% of Americans are black so every college's student body should be at least 13.4% black. If there are fewer, it's evidence of racism in their mind.
I wasn't specifically referring to this tweet. I've just noticed the actual origin of the doctrine has been completely buried and it's getting on my nerves.
Also, if I wanted to guess, she's some "hero" who escaped an "oppressive" Middle Eastern country.
Doesn't change the fact that Critical Race Theory's basis is entirely from feminism. Doesn't change that people seem to be hiding this truth.
And, of course, some BLM people in the replies "You're wrong, it's about equality".
Equality of what?
Ahh, but the type of equality they're after seems to be a moratorium on shooting black people - for any reason, even if it's a legal reason - until the number of white people who've been shot catches up.
Unless they are arrested, they will riot until no more black people are shot by police.
It's the same type of terrorism that led to the current attitude over hate speech. Physically attack anyone over saying "nigger" and have society at large give a pass for the physical assault. Other races will rarely attack you outright for saying "cracker", "gook", "chink", "kike", etc.
Once the concept of violent retaliation has been established, the next step is to establish the narrative that the word itself is causing the violence, not the free will of the individual responding to the word. This is where "speech is violence" comes from.
Now you see why the riots are happening. "Race blind policing is racial violence" is the ultimate goal.
They say equality. They mean what they call equity (aka equality of outcome). For example, 13.4% of Americans are black so every college's student body should be at least 13.4% black. If there are fewer, it's evidence of racism in their mind.
Yup. More than that is fine, too, as long as you're under-representing "privileged" people.
Remember, it's not racist if you're discriminating against white people!
LISTEN TO WOMEN OF COLOUR
“NO NOT THAT ONE”
Linda Sarsour already officially took away Ali's womanhood, so I guess her blackness is next.
Women running scared after the monster they created has been discovered.
It's Feminist Race Theory. Never let them hide that it's 100% their work, they created white privilege, they created BLM.
Maybe go read up on who Ayaan Hirsi Ali is before you you say something so absurd.
I wasn't specifically referring to this tweet. I've just noticed the actual origin of the doctrine has been completely buried and it's getting on my nerves.
Also, if I wanted to guess, she's some "hero" who escaped an "oppressive" Middle Eastern country.
Doesn't change the fact that Critical Race Theory's basis is entirely from feminism. Doesn't change that people seem to be hiding this truth.
Or read one of her books. Infidel was a genuinely great book. It started our slow but when it got going it really grabbed you.