As many have noticed, several anti-loli dipshits who cater to the anti-regressive movement, like the gab founder, have expressed remarks such as "satanic garbage" in regards to mere offensive pornographic artwork, and has also attempted to ban porn but relented due to a larger outcry.
I suspect that these individuals are tradcons, and are attempting to take over the opposition of the regressive left to further their personal agenda, which will only damage it by fracturing the dissident right and driving off the libertarian left.
I also suspect that 8chan owner Jim banned lolicon from his site because he personally hates it, and simply asked his lawyer to dig something up to use as an excuse, which fratured the community and put any user who decided to use Mark Mann's 8chan.moe at risk of abuse by the owner, who has a history of being a goddamn lolcow who got his nudes leaked and is accused of violating sex offender laws.
On the subject of Mark Mann, he defends unteralterbach despite the fact it depicts real minors, showed it to his underage niece and got disowned by his aunt for it, and is accused of running CP discord servers.
I think that the UK banned pornography featuring performances depicting dangerous or illegal acts between adults and threatened to put people caught watching it on the registry if they refuse to comply, which is a waste of resources in my opinion as liking offensive pornography made via legitimate means by adults does not make someone a criminal sexual deviant.
Another slippery slope issue we should be concerned about is future bans on zoo porn criminalizing feral porn, which is the animal equivalent of lolicon/shotacon.