Are the Israel-America supporters merely "bought off" by fancy military equipment, foreign investment and trade deals?
I don't buy it's Islamic sect differences in today's world though perhaps that mattered 100 years ago.
I feel like the middle-eastern countries siding with Israel-America are making a fatel mistake that will lead to the destruction of their countries and their countries' sovereignty in the future.
Does anyone know if the people in these countries actually support Israel-America or is it just their governments that do because their government is bought off?
I have a feeling the bought off government fans the blame of the Islamic sect differences to the commoners to try to get them to dislike Iran but I'm not sure how they justify being friends with the USA and allowing the USA to conduct military operations against Iran in their countries.
Anyone have any knowledge in this?
Reasoning implies one side against the other...few suggest sides to tempt many to reason against each other.
Buying implies taking into possession...the more possessions one holds onto; the harder it becomes to support self. Only nature supports being...any support bought from one another sells self out.
Islam implies "submission"; sect implies "to follow"...differences need to resist the wanted temptation of submitting or following, which by joining together destroys differences.
Few suggest middle-east to distract many from discerning self at the center of north; east; south; west. Few manipulate feelings to tempt one off-center and into a like-minded consensus among many.
Resisting the temptation of emotion (feeling) sustains ones differences from one another. Falling for the temptation of emotion...clashes differences together.
Country implies "to count; enumerate"...doing that permits another to hold onto accountable. Few suggest countries to trick many into giving up accountability, hence becoming a common wealth under a sovereign.
Nature represents the only actual support for each reacting division of being within.
Govern (to control) ment (mind) implies selling self out to another. There's no such thing as the "government"...only ones mind willingly permitting control by another.
All implies knowledge; each one within implies at the ledge of known...others tempt ones perception with suggested knowledge to incline towards a side, hence off the edge of knowing.
One cannot get knowledge from another, only from all moving through each one. Knowledge is not a sharable commodity for buying and selling (information), but the animation of being (inspiration).
OK, this is the psycho log that broke the camel's back
I thought I was having a stroke there for a second.