Sony v Cox: Cox not liable for copyright infringement
(www.scotusblog.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (9)
sorted by:
An opinion so obvious it makes you wonder how it managed to get this far.
Hilariously, the two dizzy cunts on the court had to disagree, and write a baffling separate opinion, to hold the door open for contributory infringement later.
Clearly they got the memo. They want to be able to hold your ISP liable for any "crime" you commit, not because it matters, but because it will force ISPs to start filtering and restricting content on your behalf.
Two steps forward, one step back. Oh well.
Bribery and the leftists want total internet control so they ordered their minion "judges" to toe the line.
It's just as absurd as holding the telephone company responsible if two criminals plan to rob a bank over the phone, eh?