You can't just declare you proved something and expect the rest of us to believe it.
Cool. SO DON’T DO THAT. You openly admitted you could not access the links, and then you proclaimed you were correct in your assessment of the content and I was wrong in my assessment. It’s like you’re not even trying, man.
Both you and 83671R18 are verging on "don't be a psycho" rule violations, so I may shut both of you down in the future.
Nah, you won’t be doing that. See, because now that I have this direct threat from you, I will never reply to anything it posts ever again. It will continue to post its comments that violate the rules, and they will continue to be reported when they violate the rules, but there will be no engagement with them from me.
Then, when you don’t act on its continued rule breaking (as you are confirming it is “on the verge of”), my statements will be vindicated.
83671R18 is more understandable since he's taking the bait
Yeah, see, compromised. “The user openly lying about another user is the real victim here!”
Cool. DOESN’T MATTER. IT’S ILLEGAL. Why are you not enforcing “the rule” when people advocate illegal things?
Let me explain the rule to you. The first part bans advocacy of illegal violence. That's self-explanatory.
The second part bans posting "other illegal activity." This is basically incriminating yourself by posting evidence of drug use, illegal firearms, etc.
Advocating for civil policies that are not law yet does not violate anything in R1. It isn't violent, and it's not illegal activity.
Nah, you won’t be doing that. See, because now that I have this direct threat from you, I will never reply to anything it posts ever again.
That would be fantastic and I encourage you to do that. I'd also encourage you to stop antagonizing people with your borderline "just keep voting" spam, because you can get hit for that too.
Advocating for civil policies that are not law yet does not violate anything in R1.
Except if you don’t like them, I suppose.
I'd also encourage you to stop antagonizing people
Didn’t happen. I’m not responsible for anyone’s emotions but my own. They can suck it the fuck up if some truth I posts hurts their feelings. Otherwise you have to act on every single report you receive under rule 2 (specifically “harassment”), regardless of what the comment says, since “antagonism” is only valid to the specific person being antagonized.
with your borderline "just keep voting" spam, because you can get hit for that too.
“NOOOOOOOOOO YOU CAN’T SAY TO BE VIOLENT”
“Okay, I’ll say to be nonviolent.”
“NOOOOOOOOOO YOU CAN’T DO THAT EITHER ONLY OPINIONS I SUPPORT CAN BE POSTED HERE”
Congrats; you’ve successfully killed the entire board. The narrative works extremely well, doesn’t it?
government makes an account to endlessly post stuff that actually violates the law
gets the community to beg for moderation
slips right in and bans every single potential thought that isn’t directly approved by the government
I’m not. There will never be any action taken to any degree, anywhere, with respect to this idea. It is not going to happen, no matter what anyone says. This is literally my position on the topic. It has been my position for nearly a decade now. Stop purposely misrepresenting what others say if you want to be taken seriously as a moderator.
“But you actually mean…”
“But you’re just being…”
“But you don’t actually support…”
Fuck you. I’m white. I say what I mean. I mean what I say. I don’t bother speaking unless I’m being honest. You said, “You are not allowed toso much as saywords to the effect that you want the law to be changed violently.” Okay. So I will not say those words, I replied. I will say the words that are legal to say, instead. “NO” you said. “YOU MAY NOT SAY THOSE WORDS BECAUSE YOU ARE ONLYPRETENDINGTO SAY THEM, BECAUSE I SAY YOU ARE.”
To which I say fuck you and congratulations. Your narrative won. Enjoy the world you wanted.
Cool. DOESN’T MATTER. IT’S ILLEGAL. Why are you not enforcing “the rule” when people advocate illegal things?
Yes, because again, you are a compromised source and have openly lied about me in the past.
Cool. SO DON’T DO THAT. You openly admitted you could not access the links, and then you proclaimed you were correct in your assessment of the content and I was wrong in my assessment. It’s like you’re not even trying, man.
Nah, you won’t be doing that. See, because now that I have this direct threat from you, I will never reply to anything it posts ever again. It will continue to post its comments that violate the rules, and they will continue to be reported when they violate the rules, but there will be no engagement with them from me.
Then, when you don’t act on its continued rule breaking (as you are confirming it is “on the verge of”), my statements will be vindicated.
Yeah, see, compromised. “The user openly lying about another user is the real victim here!”
Let me explain the rule to you. The first part bans advocacy of illegal violence. That's self-explanatory.
The second part bans posting "other illegal activity." This is basically incriminating yourself by posting evidence of drug use, illegal firearms, etc.
Advocating for civil policies that are not law yet does not violate anything in R1. It isn't violent, and it's not illegal activity.
That would be fantastic and I encourage you to do that. I'd also encourage you to stop antagonizing people with your borderline "just keep voting" spam, because you can get hit for that too.
Except if you don’t like them, I suppose.
Didn’t happen. I’m not responsible for anyone’s emotions but my own. They can suck it the fuck up if some truth I posts hurts their feelings. Otherwise you have to act on every single report you receive under rule 2 (specifically “harassment”), regardless of what the comment says, since “antagonism” is only valid to the specific person being antagonized.
Congrats; you’ve successfully killed the entire board. The narrative works extremely well, doesn’t it?
Seen it a dozen times on a dozen websites.
Huh? How are you going to nonviolently genocide Jews?
I’m not. There will never be any action taken to any degree, anywhere, with respect to this idea. It is not going to happen, no matter what anyone says. This is literally my position on the topic. It has been my position for nearly a decade now. Stop purposely misrepresenting what others say if you want to be taken seriously as a moderator.
Fuck you. I’m white. I say what I mean. I mean what I say. I don’t bother speaking unless I’m being honest. You said, “You are not allowed to so much as say words to the effect that you want the law to be changed violently.” Okay. So I will not say those words, I replied. I will say the words that are legal to say, instead. “NO” you said. “YOU MAY NOT SAY THOSE WORDS BECAUSE YOU ARE ONLY PRETENDING TO SAY THEM, BECAUSE I SAY YOU ARE.”
To which I say fuck you and congratulations. Your narrative won. Enjoy the world you wanted.