Prior to AI, I had done a lot of research into the dating stats and made some pretty bleak posts on ConPro about it. Now, we have AI (Germini Pro) so I got the AI to do the heavy lifting for me this time.
The estimated number of women in the USA who are White, single, between the ages of 18-25yo, don't have children, are not overweight, do not have herpes-2, have had 0-3 previous sexual partners, consider themselves right-wing politically and don't have visible tattoos in casual clothes is 150,000. That's 150,000 in the whole country.
If you live in a city with 1m people, there's on average about 440 women living in this city who meet this standard.
On the other hand the number of single men who are aged 18-35 is about 25m.
That means in a city of 1m there's about 73,500 men you're competing against for this kind of woman, of which, there are only 440.
You need to be in the top 0.05% of men if this is what you're after.
What makes you think you're in the top 0.05% of men?
Of course your own preferences, the preferences of the women and preferences of the men you're competing against matter to a degree but something tells me even when that's factored in, you're still scraping from the bottom.
If we just compare the number of single women without kids who are aged 18-35 (16.5m vs single men (25m) you still need to be in the top 66% of all these men to even have a shot at the loweat quality woman.
Now imagine being a man with standards. If you have standards, you better be in the top 0.1% of men or you don't stand a chance.
Hurrah, someone just discovered the wonders of fractional multiplication and why you don't shove a bunch of unnecessary factors into a search function. A stupid flower tattoo on the ankle isn't going to ruin a woman, just stipulating not being a hideous graffiti rag instead of zero tattoos is going to start ballooning those numbers immediately.
Not to mention those dumb AI numbers, if not completely hallucinated, almost certainly aren't trying to account for the coincidence rate of all those factors. Like someone with 0-3 sexual partners being much less likely to have HSV-2, or how a conservative woman is less likely to be a single mom or overweight. It will just be multiplying by baseline total population rates of all races and political inclinations, creating the worst case scenario.
Sure things are bleak, but there's weak to no justification for believing those numbers the AI pulled out its ass are accurate.
I have a masters in financial stats so don't worry, I know all the limitations. Even with the limitations accounted for the numbers are bleak. I once calculated them myself as best I could and got worse numbers than what the AI came out with using some estimates in the ranges of covariances for the different factors.
I literally did include all of what you spoke of before and got worse numbers. I think the one factor I did include prior-to that ended with worse numbers was also "the woman never once engaged in any sex work including having an OF account"
Obviously no correlation exists between all these factors and the data doesn't exist to calculate them yourself so no matter what you're guestimating. As is the case with all projections.
Muh masters in... bro shut up.
Of course the numbers are bad, most men are trash tho too so I'm not too worried about the competition.
Maybe run a set of numbers for men with equally strict requirements, white men under 30 that are not paying for only fans, not addicted to porn, not addicted to weed, not addicted to alcohol, not addicted to sports ball, play video games less than 4 hours a day, have a job making 50k plus a year or are building a business or in training for such, have stable housing, can maintain eye contact, make decisions without deferring to their mother, don't have painted nails, believe in family and not just republicuck, have basic hygiene.
I look around, and talk with my wife, and we see 99% of men failing these basic categories. The ones that don't are still afraid of leadership and commitment and are followers in their relationships with women.
To add on, A fat chick will lose weight for chad. Be chad. If she's chubby at 18, its likely not her fault. Give her direction and most women will be happy to achieve and be admired by their chad.
Based on what metric? Considering how conservatives back single mothers to the hilt, I'd guess the opposite.
The left will hand them money, but the right will hand them a sucker to abuse.