We literally have Russell Vought on tape saying he wanted to ban all adult content entirely and use government power to build a culture around birth rates
I haven't seen that, but it fits with current Right Wing Inc narratives, so I will accept as true.
How do they square that circle? I mean, there are problems with pervasive availability of porn, but how do they put all the blame there, when there is no good evidence that it has contributed to birth rate decline, as opposed to the last 100 years of state supported social changes?
I mean, if porn all got actually banned, tomorrow, how is that going to prevent false non-reciprocal DV, or SA, allegations? How is that going to prevent one's kids being taken away, and/or used as pawns by the ex and state? How is that going to safeguard a man from losing everything in a divorce? These are among the many real high risks, today, of men that would have in the past started families ASAP, and it's far from exhaustive.
Why are people at such high levels of power unable to separate symptoms from causes?
Simple - they can't blame women because that's their new supporter base.
Project 2025 believes single men are the enemy, people who abandoned their "duty" to their country.
This is why I keep going on about natalism, because that's the ideology behind all this. It's all about birth rates, about forcing men to take women's shitty deal because they don't believe you should have a choice. There's no right they won't trample to attack those they truly hate.
I mean, if porn all got actually banned, tomorrow, how is that going to prevent false non-reciprocal DV, or SA, allegations?
We already saw it in Youngkin's VA. They use the precedent of the porn ban to ban platforms where such things can be communicated. The next generation won't know how shit marriage is because it'll be heavily censored.
I haven't seen that, but it fits with current Right Wing Inc narratives, so I will accept as true.
How do they square that circle? I mean, there are problems with pervasive availability of porn, but how do they put all the blame there, when there is no good evidence that it has contributed to birth rate decline, as opposed to the last 100 years of state supported social changes?
I mean, if porn all got actually banned, tomorrow, how is that going to prevent false non-reciprocal DV, or SA, allegations? How is that going to prevent one's kids being taken away, and/or used as pawns by the ex and state? How is that going to safeguard a man from losing everything in a divorce? These are among the many real high risks, today, of men that would have in the past started families ASAP, and it's far from exhaustive.
Why are people at such high levels of power unable to separate symptoms from causes?
I have the video here - https://youtu.be/0noIS9lmR0Y
Simple - they can't blame women because that's their new supporter base.
Project 2025 believes single men are the enemy, people who abandoned their "duty" to their country.
This is why I keep going on about natalism, because that's the ideology behind all this. It's all about birth rates, about forcing men to take women's shitty deal because they don't believe you should have a choice. There's no right they won't trample to attack those they truly hate.
We already saw it in Youngkin's VA. They use the precedent of the porn ban to ban platforms where such things can be communicated. The next generation won't know how shit marriage is because it'll be heavily censored.
https://communities.win/c/KotakuInAction2/p/1ARdVvQkt6/virginia-plans-to-limit-your-abi/c