Now conservatives aren't leftists, because leftism and liberalsim are not the same thing.
But leftism is the icing that everyone sees on a cake, whereas liberalism is all the batter that makes up the cake. Most conservatives unknowingly accept the bread part of the cake without realizing it, but reject wokeism, not realizing they are natural extensions of each other.
To define what you must believe to not be a liberal
-
Women getting the right to vote was incredibly foolish, one of the most foolish things any society has ever done...the two sexes are very diffferent, they have different roles. Determining the fate of a nation is not one of them
-
The civil rights act of 1965 was a horrible thing
-
Thinking that white society as it behaves is better than black society as a general as they behave is not a racist thing, it's just a neutral observation
-
More things that I can't think of right now, but those are the majors.
I would say most conservatives would sort of get nervous and go "well I wouldn't go that far" or "I think women should be allowed to vote" or any number of things on those main issues.
I'd say 99% of Americans and Westerners in general are liberal.
You don't have to be a neo nazi or white nationalist to be not a liberal, but you have to at least reject white guilt completely.
You are correct with your topic title.
Meritocracy is liberalism and most conservatives are meritocratic.
Social programs are liberalism and most conservatives believe in social programs.
Democracy is liberalism, especially the universal suffrage kind. A universal suffrage republican is just as bad as a universal suffrage democracy.
To be right-wing, you must be racist, you must be classist, you must be sexist and you must be against social programs of any kind (low taxes, low government spending, low government involvement outside of maintaining order and enforcing the bare minimum).
You touched on correct policies that must be abolished. The Civil Rights Act is one of the most oppressive laws ever created and is wholly incompatible with non-liberalism. Taxes and government spending are about 80% higher than they ought to be. Minor violence to solve disputes should not be against the law and in fact should be encouraged, to suggest otherwise is oppressive to men who have a superior advantage in violence over women. Restricting men from violence as a dispute resolution is anti-male and not right-wing. Any ideology rooted in equality is liberalism and not right-wing. Classism+racism is the right-wing belief. Pure individualism is liberalism again because pure liberalism leads to colorblind meritocracy and genderless meritocracy both of which are liberal ideologies. Equity is great but not when it's viewed purely at an individual level. There must be collectivism based on genetics and recognition of the differences between men and women.
Simple right-wing views:
How would genetics vs location work in the U.S.A.? Are you comparing me to an Irishman and saying we are the same?
Depends what you are. Irishmen, genetically are basically the same as English (and Scottish too). They're all Anglo-Saxons who are all Germans. The differences that are taught to these tribes are mostly irrelevant and taught to cause division among similar people's. When Anglo-Saxons are the only people in the world who matter, then ideological differences that are reflected in the different ethnicities (cultures) are relevant but when Germans are being genocided (as is the cases currently), I would recommend putting these differences aside to focus on the more relevant and dangerous enemy, non-Germans.