NSDAPedos have the most amazing timing.
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (24)
sorted by:
So? The main excuse used was "security concerns" but they tried that in 2020 and failed.
They only ramped up their attempts after people made a fuss about rising antisemitism on the site when Saddam Hussein's manifesto started getting spread around.
And you expect me to believe that Hitler was elected purely because of women wanting more gibs and not because everyone was fed up with the country being screwed over? And what makes them particularly worse when everyone else was giving more women rights too?
It didn't fail, the leadership changed.
It was Osama Bin Laden's. And I read it. It sounds like every natalist retard here. "muh women and children being killed, that's not fair, in war they should be allowed to kill you but not the other way around REEEEE."
Yes, pretty much. As your side often say, Demographics are Destiny™, and Germany's led to widespread natalist socialism, because that's what helped women most. They needed to be picked up and dusted off after the Wall Street Crash left most of them having done heinous things and being rightfully hated for it. Hitler promised to blame others and force people to marry them. No shit they wanted that.
No shit he'd be concerned about women and children. Every society including the ones feminists call backwards, sexist and misogynistic cared somewhat about them.
I don't like bringing up the biology aspect of it but men are more expendable than women. Because despite being inferior, you can't maintain a civilization if you kill off all of your incubators.
And even if you did kill off all the women and somehow find a way to stop the species from going extinct with an exclusively male population, men aren't nearly as hive minded compared to women. We'd find something to fight each other over eventually, despite your insistence that all wars are feminist wars. (Except WW2 apparently, where the allies were also giving women more rights leading up to and during the war.)
That's not even getting into how absurd it is that a feminist natalist run government would make a fuss about a supposedly natalist manifesto (written by a man who's religion is incredibly patriarchal and treats women like property) getting spread on a social media site used primarily by women. Can't be because of "muh joooos!" because apparently women are inherently antisemitic and are allies of islam (a religion that would treat them worse than the fictional men in those smut books they read), so why would they want to crack down on antisemitism at all? Was the American branch jealous of Middle Eastern branch for making better propaganda or something?
You keep telling us that these German women were doing heinous things leading up to, during and after WW1. But if they were that horrible why did any men go along with them in the first place? What made them worse than literally any other type of women at the time?
We've seen how men quickly men check out of marriage when women aren't worth the effort. You expect me to believe that they'd be willing to stick it out when the women were apparently far worse?
As far as I know the Frankfurt school degenerates that wehraboos point to as an example of how bad the Weimar Republic got was comprised mostly of men. (Not to mention you'd probably dismiss those claims as feminist fear mongering anyway)
Was it them stealing men's money? It was the allies who demanded Germany pay reparations. And why would German women be more hated when it was more likely those reparations were going to the natalist cabal members in allied countries? Hell, at that point just build your feminist natalist utopia in a country that wasn't screwed over from loosing a war and keep squeezing Germany dry with reparations to do it.
Instigating political violence? They were doing that and succeeding in the more stable allied nations long before Hitler came to power if your insistence on them being behind everything bad ever is to be believed.
Was it them killing men? If that's what you want to paint them as being hated for, I'd think the German men would have a bigger hatred of the French, Americans and British for, you know, loosing a war against them. Unless you expect me to believe that "men-icide" related deaths outnumbered the amount of men who died in WW1.
How do you write so much and say so little? It's honestly a talent.
Women were hated because they were the actual people committing the acts the failed painter blamed on Jews. They pimped out kids. They robbed people. They did everything malicious they could, because they refused to let their standard of living drop with everyone else's.
He backed them to the hilt because he hated his father and had a strong identification with women, rather than men. He considered women to be better people (they weren't) and that any bad thing they do is because of outside influences (it isn't).
Would you prefer I type a simple "please consult Canadian healthcare" instead of trying to respond to your points? If your constant whining about "muh death threats" by online nobodies is anything to go by, I don't think you would.
"They pimped out kids." Most of those were girls anyway so I don't know why you care about this. And I doubt women would be the ones running the child trafficking rings when they'd more likely be pimped out themselves. You don't see poor men in their underwear standing around street corners, that's more of a woman thing.
"They robbed people." If you want to play the "feminist sisterhood" angle, those reparations were going to women outside the country. Unless you're implying the Weimar government was handing that money to German women, but I find that highly unlikely.
If Hitler hated his father to the point it pushed him into the arms of the sisterhood cabal, I'd put the fault squarely at his father's feet then. If women are so terrible, then his father must have been worse to make them seem like a better option.
Then again, all your whining about "people would have killed them all if they realized how bad they were!" also applies to the same jews (matrilineal religion, fyi) you constantly defend as innocent dindus.
A certain tribe getting kicked out for shitting up the place for everyone else isn't comparable to eliminating the entire female gender because getting rid of restrictions that have worked for centuries makes them spoiled harpies who'd ruin society.
Although I don't know why you think this is a gender specific thing. Considering your hatred of islam, which instead does the opposite gender wise, and ruins society by allowing men to commit crimes so long as it's directed towards infidels.
And yes, I agree that women aren't inherently better, but I disagree with your sentiment that everything bad throughout history has been their fault and that only you and that other fag are aware of how truly evil they are.