It biases the algorithm against assuming you are asking a good faith question that it can find the answer to with a simple Google search. After it decides not to make an API call it reverts to its training data, which ends in January 2025, and thus has no information on the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
I assume the same thing that its falling back to its last trained dataset.
But I have been using "ai" to help with programming. Asking it to write code feels futile unless its super simple.
But asking it questions like I would a teacher or a fellow student and it does a ok job at explaining why something doesnt work the way I want or how I should go about starting something.
Which is kinda nice, I can ask some machine a 1000 questions but I swear to god its like it gets annoyed sometimes(ironically like real life), and seems to work better when it is treated like a person.
It could be all in my head, I think the isolation is getting to me, or my parathyroid is about to explode. But it weirds me out a bit.
It biases the algorithm against assuming you are asking a good faith question that it can find the answer to with a simple Google search. After it decides not to make an API call it reverts to its training data, which ends in January 2025, and thus has no information on the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
I assume the same thing that its falling back to its last trained dataset.
But I have been using "ai" to help with programming. Asking it to write code feels futile unless its super simple.
But asking it questions like I would a teacher or a fellow student and it does a ok job at explaining why something doesnt work the way I want or how I should go about starting something.
Which is kinda nice, I can ask some machine a 1000 questions but I swear to god its like it gets annoyed sometimes(ironically like real life), and seems to work better when it is treated like a person.
It could be all in my head, I think the isolation is getting to me, or my parathyroid is about to explode. But it weirds me out a bit.