It's just wild they were saying stuff like this openly - bragging about getting one over on Putin, and taking Russia's Ukraine - and then turn around and say it was unprovoked.
At least pick a lane. The world would be better if people were at least honest. And I do respect even an honest villain more than a dishonest one.
I don't think you understand the sequence of events described by the interviewee in this clip. Regardless of whether or not you agree, I don't think you are capable of summarizing his position.
It's just wild they were saying stuff like this openly - bragging about getting one over on Putin, and taking Russia's Ukraine - and then turn around and say it was unprovoked.
At least pick a lane. The world would be better if people were at least honest. And I do respect even an honest villain more than a dishonest one.
They're terrible at predicting outcomes.
They have a bunch of money and zero sense.
They terrify me but I'm not afraid of them.
I don't think you understand the sequence of events described by the interviewee in this clip. Regardless of whether or not you agree, I don't think you are capable of summarizing his position.
This is a weird comment.
What exactly is your objection, and what are you objecting to?
I think it's you who isn't understanding something, but if I'm misunderstanding feel free to correct me.
If you want to properly make a counter argument, you must first summarize your opponents position. I don't think you can do that.
You haven't even made an argument yet, though.