holy crap. when I read the title, i thought it was an exaggeration of something along the lines of, " yes, some collateral damage is unavoidable in urban fighting, we can't really blame soldiers for mistakes while on edge" , which sounds reasonable enough. but this is a whole other level. "can we genocide a city we captured? yup, sure thing!"
holy crap. when I read the title, i thought it was an exaggeration of something along the lines of, " yes, some collateral damage is unavoidable in urban fighting, we can't really blame soldiers for mistakes while on edge" , which sounds reasonable enough. but this is a whole other level. "can we genocide a city we captured? yup, sure thing!"
Again, not can...should. "Should we genocide entire cities"?"