I showed this bill to my mom (boomer) yesterday and she legit went silent and then asked me to give her more details later. And this is after teeth grinding about me insisting APAIC and their Israeli sponsors seem to own the US gov. You know I'm a JQ poster, but HR867 makes me feel pretty justified. Or at least we should revisit APAIC et al as foreign agents.
PS: congress passed legislation hat effectively pronounced the Gospels as "anti-Semitic," but they passed an exception last week for the Christian religion. Why did they pass the measure to begin with?
I showed this bill to my mom (boomer) yesterday and she legit went silent and then asked me to give her more details later. And this is after teeth grinding about me insisting APAIC and their Israeli sponsors seem to own the US gov. You know I'm a JQ poster, but HR867 makes me feel pretty justified. Or at least we should revisit APAIC et al as foreign agents.
PS: congress passed legislation hat effectively pronounced the Gospels as "anti-Semitic," but they passed an exception last week for the Christian religion. Why did they pass the measure to begin with?
I hope the boomer response wasn't since it didn't pass, the government obviously isn't controlled by Israel
It was probably "who cares, my retirement account is still in the black"
Even Matt Walsh and Charlie Kirk opposed it (but more saying "you'll prove those heckin unwholesome white nationalists right about ZOG!")