I mean we already are there. Half the gay shit the people on this entire website believe is fake. And it doesn't even need AI, people believe what supports their opinions.
Do you know how many times I've heard conspiracy faggotry about the Vegas shooting that uses an argument like "OMG are we supposed to believe he removed hurricane grade windows by himself"?
Hurricane grade glass isn't a rating. In order to determine how strong the glass was youd need to actually source the glass contractor and what was purchased and get the technical specifications for it.
Do you think even one fucking person, anywhere, ever, has even attempted to find out what sort of glass was on the Mandaly Bay? Lol fuck no. These people just invent gay fucking shit and they think "hurricane grade" sounds right, and it fools similar idiots who also 'want to believe', and just like that it becomes "fact".
They even released the video of him in the lobby and elevator pushing a luggage cart with like twenty giant bags on it.
And he was paying for an expensive room, they aren't going to question it.
And it's Vegas, a city with tons of industrial conventions all the time, it's entirely within reason for a guy to have tons of bags if it contains product for a trade show.
Am I saying something about him didn't stink? No, if his whole plan was a shooting, to a rational person, his setup made no sense. Too many rifles all with odd configurations (no irons or optics on many, like they come from the factory). But again we're talking "to a rational mind".
But I've always been skeptical of nearly all conspiracy theories, and it really is as simple as this: Treat every conspiracy theory with the same level of detail and skepticism as the theorists treat the official story.
Remember Harrison Deal, the guy in Georgia? If the official story was that his car was blown up by a bomb, everyone would be talking about how the damage on the car doesn't look like a bomb, there was no debris field, there was strange damage that "folded" the Jeep, and the bodywork was still attached. People would compare it to pictures of real vehicle bombings showing pieces of bodywork sprayed all over the place.
In other words "nothing about this looks like a bomb". But because the official story was a car crash, suddenly it became a bomb even though the damage makes no sense for it to be a bomb (along with other things like inventing the lie that "the engine was 300 yards away", but you can see the front end of the vehicle was basically intact).
Conspiracy: "GARY WEBB WAS KILLED BECAUSE HE BROKE IRAN-CONTRA!"
Reality: Congress is who broke Iran Contra. Webb wrote a book years later. And he died years after the book. Also you can still buy the book... Who the fuck covers up a story that's already public?
Conspiracy: "MICHAEL HASTINGS WAS KILLED BECAUSE HE WAS GOING TO TELL THE TRUTH ABOUT THE IRAQ WAR!"
Reality: Hastings was a shitlib who sandbagged a very popular General who was critical of Obama and the Iraq war and got him fired. Both Congress and the British Parliament broke the story of the Iraq Dossier. And just like Webb, he wrote the books after the story was already public, he died long after they were written, and you can still buy them.
Also in the cases of both, not a single person who knew them really doubted the official narrative. Webb was in a downward spiral for years and his life was falling apart. Everyone who knew Hastings suggested he had a substance abuse problem.
The dumbest is "Chris Cornell was going to write a story exposing Hollywood pedophiles". Lmao literally never, not once, did he ever even suggest that that was anything he was doing.
AI art is soulless and derivative, I find nothing it makes to be of much interest at all.
But I'm willing to pretend otherwise to piss artists off, as a group they come across as wholly petulant and entitled.
I mean we already are there. Half the gay shit the people on this entire website believe is fake. And it doesn't even need AI, people believe what supports their opinions.
Do you know how many times I've heard conspiracy faggotry about the Vegas shooting that uses an argument like "OMG are we supposed to believe he removed hurricane grade windows by himself"?
Hurricane grade glass isn't a rating. In order to determine how strong the glass was youd need to actually source the glass contractor and what was purchased and get the technical specifications for it.
Do you think even one fucking person, anywhere, ever, has even attempted to find out what sort of glass was on the Mandaly Bay? Lol fuck no. These people just invent gay fucking shit and they think "hurricane grade" sounds right, and it fools similar idiots who also 'want to believe', and just like that it becomes "fact".
AI hardly changes fuck all in that regard.
They even released the video of him in the lobby and elevator pushing a luggage cart with like twenty giant bags on it.
And he was paying for an expensive room, they aren't going to question it.
And it's Vegas, a city with tons of industrial conventions all the time, it's entirely within reason for a guy to have tons of bags if it contains product for a trade show.
Am I saying something about him didn't stink? No, if his whole plan was a shooting, to a rational person, his setup made no sense. Too many rifles all with odd configurations (no irons or optics on many, like they come from the factory). But again we're talking "to a rational mind".
But I've always been skeptical of nearly all conspiracy theories, and it really is as simple as this: Treat every conspiracy theory with the same level of detail and skepticism as the theorists treat the official story.
Remember Harrison Deal, the guy in Georgia? If the official story was that his car was blown up by a bomb, everyone would be talking about how the damage on the car doesn't look like a bomb, there was no debris field, there was strange damage that "folded" the Jeep, and the bodywork was still attached. People would compare it to pictures of real vehicle bombings showing pieces of bodywork sprayed all over the place.
In other words "nothing about this looks like a bomb". But because the official story was a car crash, suddenly it became a bomb even though the damage makes no sense for it to be a bomb (along with other things like inventing the lie that "the engine was 300 yards away", but you can see the front end of the vehicle was basically intact).
Conspiracy: "GARY WEBB WAS KILLED BECAUSE HE BROKE IRAN-CONTRA!"
Reality: Congress is who broke Iran Contra. Webb wrote a book years later. And he died years after the book. Also you can still buy the book... Who the fuck covers up a story that's already public?
Conspiracy: "MICHAEL HASTINGS WAS KILLED BECAUSE HE WAS GOING TO TELL THE TRUTH ABOUT THE IRAQ WAR!"
Reality: Hastings was a shitlib who sandbagged a very popular General who was critical of Obama and the Iraq war and got him fired. Both Congress and the British Parliament broke the story of the Iraq Dossier. And just like Webb, he wrote the books after the story was already public, he died long after they were written, and you can still buy them.
Also in the cases of both, not a single person who knew them really doubted the official narrative. Webb was in a downward spiral for years and his life was falling apart. Everyone who knew Hastings suggested he had a substance abuse problem.
The dumbest is "Chris Cornell was going to write a story exposing Hollywood pedophiles". Lmao literally never, not once, did he ever even suggest that that was anything he was doing.