Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

107
age doesn't matter until it does (media.scored.co)
posted 1 year ago by rattleS 1 year ago by rattleS +107 / -0
50 comments share
50 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (50)
sorted by:
▲ 1 ▼
– Sir_Manalot 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

No it would not be easy as there is no accurate way to measure that. Plus it is a poor methodology because what people say they want is not what they actually want, online dating is skewed because only a small number of women use those sites, women are not honest about what they are okay with and online dating is heavily skewed for looks only.

Ex: Most women will say they require men to be six feet tall, but they gladly date men who are 5 foot 10 without batting an eye if they are fit and have game. Most women who are open to date older men, broke bad boys, etc are not going to say it because women are not direct communicators or logical. It will “just happen” out of nowhere and they will pretend it is some accident.

Women will even say they only want to date men who is confident and rich…but then you will find out they hid that they were sleeping with some ugly need in the past or some broke thug.

You just confirmed my theory that you have very little to no experience with real women. You are overthinking it all and are using the terminally online strategy of hyperfocusing on weak science in a field that has shown that over 80% of studies ever done fail the repeatability test.

Really, you need to get outside dude. Women are not alien, they are not logical, they are not special.

They are just irrational animals that focus on feeling good above all else. Make them feel good and they will fuck you. Make them feel gross and they will be creeped out. And it all irrational and in her head.

They will get raped as a kid and then feel creeped out by a dude minding his own business in the gym. They will let a crush fuck them and then wake up regretting it tomorrow…so now it is rape to her. They will call the cops on a dude says hi to her when she is in a bad mood.

It is why they are so hypocritical and seem complicated. But they are not complicated, men just make it so. Men especially love shooting themselves in the foot by spoiling women or improving them too much. It makes it harder to get a woman to feel anything, constantly raising the bar for what men have to do.

You cannot use science to understand woman because they are not logical. You have to use common sense instead, something most young men lack.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– Sir_Manalot 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

"we don't know how the universe was created therefore God done it"

No, it is like trying to run your entire gaming business using only marketing research and studies. You will end up getting shocked as your game flops despite all the data and science saying your game is perfect. Then you will be shocked a game like Elden Ring, one that goes against all the marketing research and studies out there on how a game should be designed, is as successful as it is.

You have an issue of being online too much and overthinking it all.

Otherwise we've just dismissed the scientific principles and theories behind biology and evolution.

When it comes to psychology, 80% of studies posted in scientific journals fail to be replicated. The issue is you are assuming this “science” is more reputable to just random opinions online when it is just as valuable.

Science is not some gospel or truth. It is just an experiment and the results of said experiment. If the experiment is weak or biased, the results are pretty meaningless.

With much changing over the years.

Like when eggs were good for you, then bad, now good again. Like how Pluto use to be a planet. Or how much psychology has changed in general.

Most studies are not to be taken as fact just because they exist, especially ones that use surveys or statistics. Some are strong enough to become scientific theories, but that is not true in psychology.

It seems most people just lack street smarts and think book smarts actually matters outside of the internet or a university.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– Sir_Manalot 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Strawman.

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - w2qgj (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy