It's one step above that. I have no idea about the common law part of it, but when you intentionally accept the significant risk that someone will get killed as a result of your unlawful actions, that counts as murder in some European countries. E.g. I can't shoot randomly into a crowd and then argue that I wasn't intending to kill someone.
Planning shows deliberate action; which shows intent. That is murder.
Reckless or negligent action that could foreseeably result in death which then does result in death is manslaughter.
If the video shows him swerving for the cyclist then that would show intent. If there comes to light testimony about how the youths discussed running over some pedestrians / cyclists before they got into the car ... then that would be planning, which would show intent.
Personally I think that their genetic line should be erased to four generations; but I am notoriously intolerant of this kind of shit.
I believe the correct term is manslaughter. their reckless actions led to the death of someone, we have laws for this.
It's one step above that. I have no idea about the common law part of it, but when you intentionally accept the significant risk that someone will get killed as a result of your unlawful actions, that counts as murder in some European countries. E.g. I can't shoot randomly into a crowd and then argue that I wasn't intending to kill someone.
The step is planning.
Planning shows deliberate action; which shows intent. That is murder.
Reckless or negligent action that could foreseeably result in death which then does result in death is manslaughter.
If the video shows him swerving for the cyclist then that would show intent. If there comes to light testimony about how the youths discussed running over some pedestrians / cyclists before they got into the car ... then that would be planning, which would show intent.
Personally I think that their genetic line should be erased to four generations; but I am notoriously intolerant of this kind of shit.