Yes, but also no. The authors of the 14th amendment were very clear with the "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" part that it didn't apply to the children of citizens of other countries. Later activist judges chose to ignore the explanations the authors gave when ratification was being debated and simply aggressively misinterpret it instead. The inevitable SC case on this EO will be interesting.
The offspring of invaders don't get to claim citizenship? Great. How on earth did it take us this long to address this?
It's in the constitution so this might not stick.
But if it holds then Canada will be the only country with birthright citizenship, a stupid concept.
Yes, but also no. The authors of the 14th amendment were very clear with the "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" part that it didn't apply to the children of citizens of other countries. Later activist judges chose to ignore the explanations the authors gave when ratification was being debated and simply aggressively misinterpret it instead. The inevitable SC case on this EO will be interesting.
i have some confidence with the current SCOTUS having revoked Roe v Wade, they might rule in Trump's favor.