The sheer amount of bad ideas being spread via tiktok currently to both children and young women (the two most impressionable and stupid demographics in America) is so pronounced that banning it for any reason is a net good.
I'd be loath to censor anything on principle, but as its a Chinese spy program anyway with no control over it, then its not covered under that.
I'm not a fan of it either, but you don't let Tokyo Rose broadcast from New York City.
Open enemy action can't be tolerated as "libertarian principles". It's just not true. It's the intentional misapplication of the NAP and treating a collectivist aggressor as if he were an individual libertarian. All communists are a violation of the NAP, because all slaves are a violation of the NAP.
So you're saying that all Communists are a violation of the NAP and we should line them up against a wall and shoot them because they are an act of war simply for existing?
Not quite. Not all aggression should be met with the same force. There is such a thing as proportionality.
A communist's existence on earth is aggression against humanity, but is to vague to do anything about.
A communist's existence in a public area you enter is an aggression against the public, and he should be roundly condemned. Then forcible removal can be discussed and agreed upon with the necessary ordinary force.
A communist's existence in a private area is an act of aggression against the private owner's rights, and you should force the communist to leave with ordinary force.
A communist's existence in your private property is an act of aggression against you, and he should be physically removed as quickly as possible.
The sheer amount of bad ideas being spread via tiktok currently to both children and young women (the two most impressionable and stupid demographics in America) is so pronounced that banning it for any reason is a net good.
I'd be loath to censor anything on principle, but as its a Chinese spy program anyway with no control over it, then its not covered under that.
I'm not a fan of it either, but you don't let Tokyo Rose broadcast from New York City.
Open enemy action can't be tolerated as "libertarian principles". It's just not true. It's the intentional misapplication of the NAP and treating a collectivist aggressor as if he were an individual libertarian. All communists are a violation of the NAP, because all slaves are a violation of the NAP.
So you're saying that all Communists are a violation of the NAP and we should line them up against a wall and shoot them because they are an act of war simply for existing?
Ah it's good to see you making progress Gizzy.
Not quite. Not all aggression should be met with the same force. There is such a thing as proportionality.
That's called losing.
If your enemy attacks you, then you kill him and end the threat he represents.
Remember: Communists aren't people.