...and just like I suspected, the image there doesn't have the game's title, which is why the image for this thread has the little selection box highlighting the game logo: because it's a screenshot taken from some image editing software where they added the logo to the image.
So yeah, still an edited image although the baseline is from the company itself...assuming of course that the collection of images taken from a reddit thread is legit, which is of course subject to the exact same scrutiny I apply to the image for this thread.
So back to square one after all.
But hey, good on you for making the effort to hunt it down. Not even being facetious when I say that.
The fact that it's quite clearly from some photo editing software should trip some alarm bells for people that it might not be legitimate, doubly so in the age of rapidly advancing AI image generation. Everyone had a good yuck about how AI could never get hands right, but that's stopped being an issue for a while now. Why shouldn't I suspect some random unsourced image of being a fabrication? Or should I just uncritically accept all those images of Trump saving kittens from Haitian barbeques the same way I'm supposed to uncritically accept this image?
I swear there used to be a modicum of skepticism and critical analysis among the denizens who frequented KotakuInAction.
The image of Ciri is from the Witcher 4 press kit: https://www.reddit.com/r/witcher/comments/1hd8zxx/slides_from_the_witcher_4_press_kit/
...and just like I suspected, the image there doesn't have the game's title, which is why the image for this thread has the little selection box highlighting the game logo: because it's a screenshot taken from some image editing software where they added the logo to the image.
So yeah, still an edited image although the baseline is from the company itself...assuming of course that the collection of images taken from a reddit thread is legit, which is of course subject to the exact same scrutiny I apply to the image for this thread.
So back to square one after all.
But hey, good on you for making the effort to hunt it down. Not even being facetious when I say that.
Ah, you meant that it's not the character is fake, but that this is not actually the cover of the game.
Then you do have a valid point.
The fact that it's quite clearly from some photo editing software should trip some alarm bells for people that it might not be legitimate, doubly so in the age of rapidly advancing AI image generation. Everyone had a good yuck about how AI could never get hands right, but that's stopped being an issue for a while now. Why shouldn't I suspect some random unsourced image of being a fabrication? Or should I just uncritically accept all those images of Trump saving kittens from Haitian barbeques the same way I'm supposed to uncritically accept this image?
I swear there used to be a modicum of skepticism and critical analysis among the denizens who frequented KotakuInAction.
I never said you shouldn't.
That was a loooong time ago, unfortunately.
We saw the trailer with our own eyes. This is what she looks like. Why are you playing defense for Woker 4?
cope and seethe