They already have their enterprise licensing shit for that. They make ungodly amounts of money licensing their OS and office software to businesses. They didn't need to burn their good products to the ground, they just needed to continue charging businesses for products that worked like they'd been doing for years already.
I thoroughly reject the premise that they needed to change the OS in order to sell it again because they were already on the subscription model for perpetual revenue.
You can't make money making a great long-lasting product. Gotta push shit shovelware 24/7.
They already have their enterprise licensing shit for that. They make ungodly amounts of money licensing their OS and office software to businesses. They didn't need to burn their good products to the ground, they just needed to continue charging businesses for products that worked like they'd been doing for years already.
I thoroughly reject the premise that they needed to change the OS in order to sell it again because they were already on the subscription model for perpetual revenue.
Welcome to the rent-seeking economy.