One of the most salient aspects of Sowell and why he’s so rational compared to so many others is his defining characteristic is asking “what is the tradeoff”. It’s the defining characteristic of modern conservatism, what do we get for x, what are the benefits and what are the costs. In this aspect we are now faced with in the current zeitgeist is “what is the tradeoff of H1Bs”. Why are corporations so hell bent on H1B, what are the ramifications, and who does it benefit? This has been the delineation between morality, reason, and practice. I’m posting this as food for thought. Who benefits and at what cost?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (26)
sorted by:
No, the cracks just haven't become obvious to the average normie yet. I can point at Microsoft's horror show over the last ten years and every sysadmin will know of what I speak, but the average consumer hasn't developed any concerns regarding the long term stability of the Windows operating system.
AI made things better for them. I have one Indian guy on my team, his code was incredibly bad, it barely worked and had 0 reusability among customers.
Now we're using AI, his code has improved drastically. He still needs input on what needs improvement but I can actually use it. As a friend of mine said, is all nice until you do code review and you ask them what was the logic behind it.
If AI basically does all the job why you need to hire indians instead of rednecks?
Ai is a tool. Someone has to use it.
Why hand a good tool to a bad worker instead of handing a good tool to a good worker?