Turn off the welfare printers, both individual and corporate, and the government wouldn't have to make one booking. They'd show themselves the door. And those that wouldn't, well, make sure the real citizens are armed so they can practice some healthy self-defense.
A fairly immediate consequence of turning off welfare payment will be taking a bunch of kids from their mothers.
There are a whole subset of strong, independent women (especially in the 13 % demographic) with no job and no job skills. When their kids start to starve, they need to be put in state care.
We can argue why this happened and what kind of state care is best, but right now these kids are literal hostages to continuing welfare payments.
No one said reduce foster care payments. You act kind of like it's cutting welfare that caused this problem. Nah it exposed it. If you're actually trying to solve shit you prrobably do need to take kids from terrible parents.
I don't disagree with you. Welfare has been fantastically destructive, especially to the sections of the community it is supposed to help. They are stuck in the welfare trap and are going on to experience intergenerational poverty and fatherlessness.
That said, the opponents to removing the welfare payments are going to scream: "Think of the children! Why do you hate poor women and children? Why do you hate black single mothers!"
In the past, this tactic has been fantastically effective on normies.
Turn off the welfare printers, both individual and corporate, and the government wouldn't have to make one booking. They'd show themselves the door. And those that wouldn't, well, make sure the real citizens are armed so they can practice some healthy self-defense.
A fairly immediate consequence of turning off welfare payment will be taking a bunch of kids from their mothers.
There are a whole subset of strong, independent women (especially in the 13 % demographic) with no job and no job skills. When their kids start to starve, they need to be put in state care.
We can argue why this happened and what kind of state care is best, but right now these kids are literal hostages to continuing welfare payments.
No one said reduce foster care payments. You act kind of like it's cutting welfare that caused this problem. Nah it exposed it. If you're actually trying to solve shit you prrobably do need to take kids from terrible parents.
I don't disagree with you. Welfare has been fantastically destructive, especially to the sections of the community it is supposed to help. They are stuck in the welfare trap and are going on to experience intergenerational poverty and fatherlessness.
That said, the opponents to removing the welfare payments are going to scream: "Think of the children! Why do you hate poor women and children? Why do you hate black single mothers!"
In the past, this tactic has been fantastically effective on normies.
If I were in charge, we'd be rolling shit back, so black single mothers would have to work. Or homestead for all I care.