Most of them do, but now they're being fed the lie that right wingers are going to start putting them into camps because people have had enough humoring their delusions. Talk about a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Thanks to the top Tranny Lawyer in America currently speaking before the SCOTUS, its been confirmed that they in fact do not. The entire suicide thing was a garbage study concocted entirely to garner sympathy and push for more "affirming care" practices.
So by their own admission it was a manipulation tactic they created that got turned against them.
I also saw there were oral arguments about a case, Eau Claire vs. Wisconsin, which failed to get 4 justices to sign on. (Alito wrote the dissent, three justices were interested in hearing the case, which was about a school district policy to not notify parents of gender-confused students about said confusion.)
I don't have a link for specifics argument. I would bet Adamrises is talking about arguments in the Tennessee case, which is explicitly about the healthcare 'benefits' of transing kids.
Forbes seems to drop clips on youtube of government proceedings sometimes. I'm gonna check there, but yeah. I'd appreciate some support digging on this one.
Why can't trannies just kill themselves, and not take others with them?
Most of them do, but now they're being fed the lie that right wingers are going to start putting them into camps because people have had enough humoring their delusions. Talk about a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Thanks to the top Tranny Lawyer in America currently speaking before the SCOTUS, its been confirmed that they in fact do not. The entire suicide thing was a garbage study concocted entirely to garner sympathy and push for more "affirming care" practices.
So by their own admission it was a manipulation tactic they created that got turned against them.
Got a link or two to this? I’m out of the loop on this.
Here's what I found in terms of recent/current/future Trans supreme court cases:
A Tennessee trans case: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/justice-alito-supreme-court-transgender-case-b2658961.html
Tennessee's law against "gender-affirming care" seems to be holding.
I also saw there were oral arguments about a case, Eau Claire vs. Wisconsin, which failed to get 4 justices to sign on. (Alito wrote the dissent, three justices were interested in hearing the case, which was about a school district policy to not notify parents of gender-confused students about said confusion.)
From Idaho, Little v. Hecox; From W. Virginia, W. Virginia v. P.B.J. Both these cases are about Trans athletes in women's sports.
I don't have a link for specifics argument. I would bet Adamrises is talking about arguments in the Tennessee case, which is explicitly about the healthcare 'benefits' of transing kids.
Forbes seems to drop clips on youtube of government proceedings sometimes. I'm gonna check there, but yeah. I'd appreciate some support digging on this one.
EDIT: I think this is the exchange. u/Adamrises can you confirm?