The military used to require it and some troops still elect to get one after starting active duty. It's "no longer needed" provided you don't plan on living outside of polite society for extended periods.
There is no health benefit to routine infant circumcision, and the only health problem that circumcision helps with is phimosis, something that has nothing to do with "polite society" as you allude to societal medical quality, since phimosis isn't a disease/infection.
Either you're incredibly ignorant, or you're coping with the reality that you've been going along with a very evil lie that you could have easily seen was false if only you cared to see.
The military used to require it and some troops still elect to get one after starting active duty. It's "no longer needed" provided you don't plan on living outside of polite society for extended periods.
There is no health benefit to routine infant circumcision, and the only health problem that circumcision helps with is phimosis, something that has nothing to do with "polite society" as you allude to societal medical quality, since phimosis isn't a disease/infection.
Either you're incredibly ignorant, or you're coping with the reality that you've been going along with a very evil lie that you could have easily seen was false if only you cared to see.
He's like those coping that the lockdowns were okay and useful but ''no longer necessary''.
No. It was harmful all along.
Citation Needed
Funny how the military of other countries never needed this and their men weren't dying of dick infections.
I never heard a word about it either way over 20 years.