I'm honestly shocked that/if this passes free speech muster.
Of course, the jury didn't weigh the facts, and instead did an Orange Man Bad, but if it is defamation to point out that SA allegations are BS, then the converse also holds: namely that they are at least 51% likely to be true.
Gotta hit this one until someone learns. He was found liable for defamation for claiming her sexual abuse claims were bullshit. Not sexual abuse.
the lady was such a fucking creep that even anderson cooper cut her off
I'm honestly shocked that/if this passes free speech muster.
Of course, the jury didn't weigh the facts, and instead did an Orange Man Bad, but if it is defamation to point out that SA allegations are BS, then the converse also holds: namely that they are at least 51% likely to be true.
It doesn't. It's one of the many points of appeal.