I'm honestly shocked that/if this passes free speech muster.
Of course, the jury didn't weigh the facts, and instead did an Orange Man Bad, but if it is defamation to point out that SA allegations are BS, then the converse also holds: namely that they are at least 51% likely to be true.
I'm honestly shocked that/if this passes free speech muster.
Of course, the jury didn't weigh the facts, and instead did an Orange Man Bad, but if it is defamation to point out that SA allegations are BS, then the converse also holds: namely that they are at least 51% likely to be true.
It doesn't. It's one of the many points of appeal.