The Wikipedia page has been edited since that archive to make the reference even more blatant, but the context of the claim is the same.
All of which, in turn, comes from a New Statesman article by one author with an agenda.
And that, ladies and gents, is how you change a narrative. Put out a bullshit, "original-research" article, get it in a "reputable" publication; have it cited on Wikipedia and then have Google's AI scrape the Wiki page and present its content as undisputed "fact".
Not really anything new, tbh, We did have the same thing with the news and printed books for a while, it is just that for a moment of time the internet were free and now they will choke it like all else.
This is why the whole left-being-in-charge-of-AI thing is so goddamned frightening to me. Google already serves up a an "AI Overview" for nearly every search you - and every other person on the planet - does now. The "AI" that provides that summary is trained by, and trained on stuff exclusively produced by, the left. They are the sole deciders of what is a "credible" source, and they are building the "AI" to have the same opinion of what is "credible" as they do.
They are going to have virtually total control over what people believe is "true".
I don't know why there aren't more people on the right that are terrified right now. Thinking of how the left abuses literally every bit of power they come into, they are 100% going to use this for indoctrination, and narrative control.
Every time someone talks to me about how great AI is, I have to counter with the fact that every single mainstream "AI' tech that's being used right now are controlled by woke as fuck, retarded, and DERANGED leftists. Some of those leftists having meltdowns from Trump's win are in the very companies that tried to stop him from winning and that are helping to stupify these AIs.
The thing is, I don't know what can be done to stop these leftists from "poisoning" these AIs with this left wing ideology. I do not want to use the government to "force" them to knock it off because that would be compelled speech. For me it has to be one of two things - either ALL of it is ok (AI should be allowed to say the same things both a leftist and a conservative says) or it should be banned altogether.
But I know banning it is just gonna make it worse for us in the long run as our enemies utilize it.
The only time I've been enjoying AI is it being used to get people who would never sing a song to sing covers of random ass songs. Hearing Donald Trump sing 50 Cent's "Many Men" after narrowly missing an assassination attempt is funny as hell.
You also can’t turn off “AI Overview”, on Google search, on desktop, now…
For a while you could, but then naturally enough they killed that lol. Because of course…
Obviously you can ignore it, but the fact that it is now forced upon all users, everywhere (I believe), whether we like it or not? That’s pretty scary, too…
The "source" in question:
https://archive.is/sQT5s
The Wikipedia page has been edited since that archive to make the reference even more blatant, but the context of the claim is the same.
All of which, in turn, comes from a New Statesman article by one author with an agenda.
And that, ladies and gents, is how you change a narrative. Put out a bullshit, "original-research" article, get it in a "reputable" publication; have it cited on Wikipedia and then have Google's AI scrape the Wiki page and present its content as undisputed "fact".
Scary times.
Not really anything new, tbh, We did have the same thing with the news and printed books for a while, it is just that for a moment of time the internet were free and now they will choke it like all else.
They did this to us during GamerGate 1.0 too.
This is why the whole left-being-in-charge-of-AI thing is so goddamned frightening to me. Google already serves up a an "AI Overview" for nearly every search you - and every other person on the planet - does now. The "AI" that provides that summary is trained by, and trained on stuff exclusively produced by, the left. They are the sole deciders of what is a "credible" source, and they are building the "AI" to have the same opinion of what is "credible" as they do.
They are going to have virtually total control over what people believe is "true".
I don't know why there aren't more people on the right that are terrified right now. Thinking of how the left abuses literally every bit of power they come into, they are 100% going to use this for indoctrination, and narrative control.
Every time someone talks to me about how great AI is, I have to counter with the fact that every single mainstream "AI' tech that's being used right now are controlled by woke as fuck, retarded, and DERANGED leftists. Some of those leftists having meltdowns from Trump's win are in the very companies that tried to stop him from winning and that are helping to stupify these AIs.
The thing is, I don't know what can be done to stop these leftists from "poisoning" these AIs with this left wing ideology. I do not want to use the government to "force" them to knock it off because that would be compelled speech. For me it has to be one of two things - either ALL of it is ok (AI should be allowed to say the same things both a leftist and a conservative says) or it should be banned altogether.
But I know banning it is just gonna make it worse for us in the long run as our enemies utilize it.
The only time I've been enjoying AI is it being used to get people who would never sing a song to sing covers of random ass songs. Hearing Donald Trump sing 50 Cent's "Many Men" after narrowly missing an assassination attempt is funny as hell.
You also can’t turn off “AI Overview”, on Google search, on desktop, now…
For a while you could, but then naturally enough they killed that lol. Because of course…
Obviously you can ignore it, but the fact that it is now forced upon all users, everywhere (I believe), whether we like it or not? That’s pretty scary, too…
"My grandmother told me 'No matter what anybody tells you, War of the Worlds was inspired by Tasmanians after colonization.'"