Election: NYT 11/4
Donald Trump wants to take away Fluoride from water
Answering questions on our election coverage.
E: NYT: Kamala is a woman
Kamala Harris will make history as the first black woman president! She's too humble to talk about it.
They're trading attacks on gender. Trump should be nicer since she's a woman.
Trump says he will protect women. What a misogynistic opinion!
E: NYT: LBGTQ
Harris vs Trump on LBGTQ
JD Vance talks to Joe Rogan, and we only want to talk about his comments on LGBT.
E: NYT: Insurrectionist
Telegram has messages about protesting. None of them are saying Donald Trump told them to do this. He must be telling them to say this!
He is getting dark and morbid and says he shouldn't have left the white house. He lost, get over it! Yeah
E: NYT: Kamala on SNL
She appeared on the show!
She gave a pep talk to Maya Rudolph
Abortion always the thing they try to push as THE issue for elections, fortunately seems to have weakened appeal nowadays.
Sharp opinion here. If you tell me you shouldn't "protect someone against their will", then it means you've never protected anyone.
Protecting you whether you like it or not is what every cop, fireman, emt, trauma nurse, medic, or corpsman is trained to do. They'll save your life, sometimes while you beg for death; because that is what it actually means to try and save people.
Women voting for their own rape is something we have an obligation to protect them from, whether or not they approve. Doing what is right is not necessarily popular.
It's far more telling than it may first appear, it means someone has never had to look out for "that friend" who got too drunk and now needs kept off the road and/or away from sharp edges/long drops.
At a fundamentally more primal level it brings up the point anyone claiming this has never had children, or pets, because they are absolutely retarded enough at times to end up getting hurt and/or killed simply through sheer lack of awareness at every day things like cars, stairs, and a whole list of other things.
Literally "Dad Reflexes"
I don't know if it's been noted yet, but it's my understanding that Harris, being the current VP, is the one who has to certify the election. (Correct me if I'm wrong on this, seems like a Michigan/Arizona scenario again)
So to me it's a matter of going two different ways.
Harris and co. steal it through mail-in ballots and destroying votes/registration, she certifies her own fraudulent election.
Trump wins and Harris refuses to certify, basically doing what the Deep State proclaimed protesters wanted Pence to do but didn't.
This is slightly incorrect. The Vice President doesn't certify the election. The Vice President counts the votes. What happens before this is that governors certify electors of which to send officially to DC.
Now, let me try to clear up some shenanigans.
In 2020, it was legal for the Vice President, as it had been for the entire history of the country, to choose which electors to count. If he refused to count electors sent to him & certified by the governor he could do that. The Democrats claimed that despite this happening 3 times, this (in and of itself) was an insurrection. Since it was somehow an insurrection that never happened before, Kamala Harris herself pushed for a bill to make sure that the VP's role was now ceremonial in nature, and could only count certified slates of electors.
The governors of the state certify the slates of electors of which the governor claims represent the state's final popular vote. THERE ARE ALWAYS A REPUBLICAN AND DEMOCRATIC SLATE OF ELECTORS PREPARED AHEAD OF TIME. Depending on the vote outcome, the governor chooses one to certify. As I mentioned previously, the VP has previously counted uncertified slates of electors. The VP also refused to count certified slates of electors. This was legal until 2021.
What Trump and Trump supporters got in trouble for was that they sent uncertified electors to DC, and claimed they were "duly elected". This has been declared insurrection. Just so we're clear. The DOJ claims that because they called themselves "duly elected" and not certified, this is fraud. It's not. In fact, anyone, including the Libertarian and Green Party, can send slates of uncertified electors. What they really didn't like is that Trump managed to send slates of electors that weren't the official pre-designated republican slate. Again, this is legal, but this is being treated as terrorism by the feds.
The problem with Harris is that she shot herself in the foot 3 years ago and didn't know it. She can't stop the count. She made it criminal for her to do so. Now, it's possible that she could break the law and do it anyway, creating a constitutional crisis, an impeachment struggle, and a House of Representatives vote. I've argued this may still happen, but it's unlikely if Trump does well.
The real danger here comes from the governors. People like Shapiro and Hobbs may simply certify the Democratic electors regardless of whether or not the vote count has stopped, or what it's at. If the Republicans send up their electors, those electors may go to jail, causing a constitutional crisis. If Trump orders them, he may be arrested, causing a constitutional crisis. It won't get her any new votes, but it won't get Trump to 270.
However, this requires Harris to have the political capital that could afford a major constitutional crisis... I don't think she has it, and I think a few people, like Shapiro himself, would rather watch her fail, that risk it all on a House Vote for president that Trump could potentially still win.
Okay that clears it up for me.
I'm glad I could help!
If she does the second, it will be hard to watch.