I don't know that that's exactly true, I'd want to read the decision in detail. But for the sake of argument, lets assume it is. Abortion, like murder, doesn't fall within federal jurisdiction in the first place unless it's a crime on federal property or on federal land.
The problem with RvW that got it overturned wasn't about federal jurisdiction. Federal jurisdiction covers anything and everything thanks to loopholes like the interstate commerce clause. What got it overturned was that it was never passed as a law in the first place.
Any state can ban it or allow it as they see fit. The federal government could do the same.
I don't know that that's exactly true, I'd want to read the decision in detail. But for the sake of argument, lets assume it is. Abortion, like murder, doesn't fall within federal jurisdiction in the first place unless it's a crime on federal property or on federal land.
The problem with RvW that got it overturned wasn't about federal jurisdiction. Federal jurisdiction covers anything and everything thanks to loopholes like the interstate commerce clause. What got it overturned was that it was never passed as a law in the first place.
Any state can ban it or allow it as they see fit. The federal government could do the same.
The interstate commerce clause is broad, but I still think it would be a hell of a challenge to claim federal regulation on it in the first place.
The interstae commerce clause was used and upheld for said use by the SC to prevent a farmer growing food for his own use of his own property.
Oh shit it's you lol.
Never mind.
Yes it's me. My name is above my message. Which decision was that?