How do you explain Dresden? Who got put on trial for literal tornadoes of fire and liquid asphalt burning civilians alive? Who got sentenced for piloting the planes the next day that gunned down the survivors fleeing into the woods?
If you win the war then whatever atrocities you committed aren't war crimes. We nuked two cities for god's sake.
You are not this retarded Gizortnik, so I can only conclude that you are willfully refusing to understand reality because it would cause you massive cognitive dissonance.
Sherman's doing was worse than anything because he was doing that to Americans. Going and massacring foreigners is a thing. I think greater hate is rightly reserved for those who commit atrocities back home.
I don't even understand your complaint. I'm literally saying both victors and the defeated can commit war crimes. As for how war crimes actually exist, read my exchange with Beefy Belisarius in this thread. I quoted from Clausewitz who goes over the concept quite quickly and simply.
That being said, I also agree with The Fat Electrician in that "It's not a war crime the first time".
War crimes aren't real, and even if they were, they're only inflicted upon the losers by the winners.
So losers can't commit war crimes? That's retarded.
It's typically committed by people who don't think they will be held to account for doing them.
How do you explain Dresden? Who got put on trial for literal tornadoes of fire and liquid asphalt burning civilians alive? Who got sentenced for piloting the planes the next day that gunned down the survivors fleeing into the woods?
If you win the war then whatever atrocities you committed aren't war crimes. We nuked two cities for god's sake.
You are not this retarded Gizortnik, so I can only conclude that you are willfully refusing to understand reality because it would cause you massive cognitive dissonance.
Gen. Sherman burning and raping the South was reduced to a quirky joke.
Win the war, write yourself as the moral side, and silence witnesses to your so-called "war crimes" as crazy conspiracists and sore losers.
The ONLY crime is losing the war. Everything else is a humiliation ritual. Vae victis.
Sherman's doing was worse than anything because he was doing that to Americans. Going and massacring foreigners is a thing. I think greater hate is rightly reserved for those who commit atrocities back home.
I don't even understand your complaint. I'm literally saying both victors and the defeated can commit war crimes. As for how war crimes actually exist, read my exchange with Beefy Belisarius in this thread. I quoted from Clausewitz who goes over the concept quite quickly and simply.
That being said, I also agree with The Fat Electrician in that "It's not a war crime the first time".