HIV/AIDS dosen't have nearly an as skewed distribution, although sex pests who do anal sex are still disproportionately spreading HIV, it's nowhere near 98-99% of cases. ( It's up to 50% homos, though. )
Before better testing, HIV/AIDS also had a very long ''quiet'' phase, meaning for years, cases were the first infected who had progressed to AIDS : gay/bi turbo-whores, before it trickled-down discretly among a significant number of heterosexuals who then spent months/years not knowing they had it.
No such factor with Monkeypox. There is no discretion there. It causes visible, uncomfortable to downright highly painful sores. And after natural infection, it results in lifelong immunity.
It takes a special kind of turbo-degenerate to think ''lol, must be my herpes, I'll still fuck a bunch of random people and take drugs if the pain interferes with my weekly orgies''.
Yes I have looked into the Duesberg Hypothesis and I was throughoutly unconvinced.
What sealed the deal for me was the outcomes of the usual suspect drug-using turbo-whores HIV+ going on antiretrovirals not dying of AIDS, while the similar drug-using HIV+ whores who did not take antiretrovirals died of AIDS.
None of this is an excuse for drug abuse and promiscuous sex. As monkeypox proved yet again, those behaviors cause the emergence of new STDs.
I've looked into this pretty thoroughly, and your 2nd paragraph is news to me. I hate to be 'that guy', but can you point me to the studies? I've just never seen that.
Wasn't the AIDS epidemic back in the 80s only an epidemic because there was a way larger amount of women having sex with bisexual men than there was with monkeypox when that happened?
I think it has everything to do with monkeypox causing visible, painful sores and only a special kind of degenerate will fuck a bunch of people despite that.
You are describing the the exact same situation as the AIDS epidemic.
HIV/AIDS dosen't have nearly an as skewed distribution, although sex pests who do anal sex are still disproportionately spreading HIV, it's nowhere near 98-99% of cases. ( It's up to 50% homos, though. )
Before better testing, HIV/AIDS also had a very long ''quiet'' phase, meaning for years, cases were the first infected who had progressed to AIDS : gay/bi turbo-whores, before it trickled-down discretly among a significant number of heterosexuals who then spent months/years not knowing they had it.
No such factor with Monkeypox. There is no discretion there. It causes visible, uncomfortable to downright highly painful sores. And after natural infection, it results in lifelong immunity.
It takes a special kind of turbo-degenerate to think ''lol, must be my herpes, I'll still fuck a bunch of random people and take drugs if the pain interferes with my weekly orgies''.
Have you ever looked into the Duesberg Hypothesis? It's way more convincing (and verifiable) than the 'official version'.
Yes I have looked into the Duesberg Hypothesis and I was throughoutly unconvinced.
What sealed the deal for me was the outcomes of the usual suspect drug-using turbo-whores HIV+ going on antiretrovirals not dying of AIDS, while the similar drug-using HIV+ whores who did not take antiretrovirals died of AIDS.
None of this is an excuse for drug abuse and promiscuous sex. As monkeypox proved yet again, those behaviors cause the emergence of new STDs.
I've looked into this pretty thoroughly, and your 2nd paragraph is news to me. I hate to be 'that guy', but can you point me to the studies? I've just never seen that.
Wasn't the AIDS epidemic back in the 80s only an epidemic because there was a way larger amount of women having sex with bisexual men than there was with monkeypox when that happened?
I think it has everything to do with monkeypox causing visible, painful sores and only a special kind of degenerate will fuck a bunch of people despite that.
Oh, I forgot the symptoms for monkeypox, nevermind lol
It was a way to push the homo agenda without admitting that gay behavior did it.
They literally used women & children as a shield.