I used to just check White and that was it. Now I will mark other and list my predominant cultural heritage English and Norwegian. Do you think this is a mistake? Should I be broader and say European heritage? Should I just mark the White box?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (48)
sorted by:
Dunno how serious you are about using their bizarre nomenclature correctly but since I like etymology, the greek root a-[thing] is supposed to mean without-[thing].
So aromantic is supposed to mean you feel no romantic connections with anyone, same pattern as asexual or atheist. Linguistically just "romantic" should be the proper opposite, but if you want to use their tard language terms on them "alloromantic demisexual" is what you want. Or you could try "reciproromantic demisexual" as tongue twister way of saying "not a simp".
I think that you're thinking of anromantic rather than aromantic. But it's a good point, alloromantic is probably the one they can go with.
Oh-no anromantic is an even more advanced stage of tard language.
If aromantic is without or apathetic towards romantic feelings. Then anromantic is supposed to be the active loathing of romantic feelings. Aka anti-romantic.
I can only presume they chose not go with their standard template and call it "romophobic" because too many of them related to it, joyless misanthropes they are, and they didn't want to lumped in with the other dirty 'phobes.
That or they were worried that, even though it doesn't quite make sense, it maybe sounded racist against gay Asians saying homophobic.
Noted. I'll have to shift some of that in my notes.
Just use aromatic. Person of smell.