Or rather why do people care about Hamas at all? Their activities are contained in the Middle East, they aren't the West's problem, , they are mostly israel's problem and their main goal is to get Palestinian land back , so they are mostly Palestinian nationalists. Im not sure what is the problem with that exactly. The only people who should logically have a problem with hamas are israeli shills but even they should only really blame themselves because Netenyahu admitted that he helped to fund hamas.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (127)
sorted by:
i have yet to see any evidence that Hamas would come after us next. The Taliban didn't . They stayed in Afghanistan once they took over it. However israel HAS taken over tons of Western institutions and is a bigger problem than both Hamas and the Taliban.
I submit to you literally the entirety of history, where Islam is about taking over the world. New Somalia (sorry, Minnesota, for now) where they've started taking over nicely. Europe, with the trucks of peace and gentle stabbings. Etc.
You're so hyper fixated on "muh jews" it's not funny. It's just pathetic.
Who opened the gates of Toledo?
Who's instrumental in the flooding of the US with immigrants again? Oh right, the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society boasts about being instrumental in the passage of the 1965 immigration act and is vehemently open borders. A very Muslim organization.
The communist left. You can tell because the entire dnc platform enables it, and half the population votes for them.
The shortbus brigade rides again!
Better not look too closely at the leadership of the Russian and attempted German communist revolution.
yet it’s always the jews promoting immigration, no borders, multiculturalism, and diversity here in america and doing the exact opposite for israel
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Approved: Doesn't do that yet. Just standard jew-hate pretending that different jews with different opinions in different places are actually the same one jew.
Comment Reported For: Rule 12 - Disinformation
Very possibly, but he may be simply ignorant. The Barbary Slave Trade is a valid example of Islam waging war against Christians, as it was a long time practice of the Barbary Islamic Caliphate. It was standard practice for centuries that all Islamic countries around the Mediterranean would kidnap, enslave, and castrate Kuffar (Christians) from Europe.
This aggression was religiously based in Islamic supremacism, and the US attempted to negotiate with the Caliphate that as a country with no official state religion, attacks on US ships were inappropriate. This did not work, and led to the war, and President Jefferson's attempt to depose the government.
These were religiously motivated attacks by a religion that saw non-Muslims as inherently inferior and deserving of slavery.
And American Whites saw Blacks as inherently inferior. Was slavery in the US also religiously motivated or perhaps rather racially and financially motivated? The Berbers were pirates and slave traders that targeted Europeans and also Subsaharan Africans if they could get their hands on them. This was their lifestyle. They weren't a unified entity but a collection of pirate cities and states. This was a piracy/slave trader conflict. Not a religious war.
Just because religions plays/played a huge role in the life of people doesn't mean everything single thing is solely or primarily motivated by that religion. Religion isn't everything.
If you think that's me defending Islam as a religion then you're a fool. Unlike you I can and will separately judge the people and their religion and will not pretend that someone becomes an entirely different person just because they've changed their religion.
I'm afraid none of this is true. First and foremost Islam is a totalitarian religion, so yes it is the primary motivation for anything done by a Muslim. Second, you are defending Islam by rejecting it's history, but that's not my primary concern. Third, the Barbary States is a misnomer by the United States because they did not understand the political construction of the Caliphate. It wasn't a random assortment of pirate coves (like the coast of South Carolina in the 1600's). It was a Caliphate. Fourth, the Barbary Caliphate did not extend it's operations to Sub-Saharan Africa because it would have been too far away and impassible, when Christians were already near, were by definition inferior, and were regularly in conflict with the Ottoman Empire. The Portuguese and Spanish were the ones getting Sub-Saharan slaves.
Religion absolutely motivated the access to Christians as slaves due to the fact that they were considered a morally inferior people by definition. Islam never opposed slavery, but any Kufar or Infadel defying Islam should be killed or enslaved. Islam even played a role in how ships were attacked. The reason US Marines are called "leather necks" was because of the conflict with the Barbary Caliphate. Unlike any conflict with any Christian state, Sailors, Marines, and civilians would constantly be beheaded both in combat and during capture as a Islamic tradition. To avoid this fate during combat, the marines began wearing thick leather straps across their necks on their uniforms. This is how the term "Leatherneck" originates.
My primary issue, again, is that your talking like a Leftist, and I'm not sure you can help it. You've now made a philosophically Liberal-Atheist statement about the separation of a person from their religion, assuming that most societies even tolerate agnosticism.
Your comments, perspectives, and assumptions are all explicitly Leftist.
Simply be honest about what you are, and I'll drop it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbary_slave_trade
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moro_conflict
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American%E2%80%93Algerian_War_(1785%E2%80%931795)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Barbary_War
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egyptian_Expedition_(1882)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philippine%E2%80%93American_War
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_I
And?
Proves you wrong. Especially because Israel, the country we know today, did not exist back then and America was attacked by Islam in those occasions.
So literally all of history where Muslims never invaded anyone didn't happen? Iran calling us the great satan and calling for "death to America" doesn't happen?
Did you toss your pager away in fear?
I know you guys can't feel shame because you're in a cult, but damn.
After the second siege of Vienna in 1683 the Ottoman empire stopped being a threat to Europe and lost all it's conquering ambitions and abilities towards Euope. Since then it was just another nation doing the usual nation stuff.
Don't pretend to know history if you obviously don't.
Yeah and when exactly did Iran go that route? Was it before or after Israel popped up? Was it before or after the US/CIA did their shenanigans in Iran and the Middle East? Exactly.
Funny how terrorism is suddenly a good thing. By the way do you know who first started committing terrorist attacks to achieve political goals in the Middle East? I bet you do.
Ah, yes, sending millions of rapefugees to the west is clearly normal nation stuff.
When religious fanatics got into power.
Hamas are legitimate military targets.
You're just mad your goat molesting friends got killed.
It's quite amazing really how dumb you guys are. But the inferiority complex makes sense, as apparently the jews as super powerful and nobody can stop them (even the superior white man). But nobody said cult ideology has to make sense.