So your "it's culture" comment falls flat. Because yes that's the neo-lib conventional wisdom but historically it isn't accurate. And the times it HAS been accurate. It's been modern and exclusive to Whites.
I'm not even editorializing on this point. Conclude what you will.
Even among people who have a strong ethnic preference, it certainly is not the case that it is you default to an ingroup preference of a race over ethnicity, and ethnicity over familiarity. An American white is not likely to affiliate with a non-English Russian who shares no religion, value set, language, or economic tie; compared to the American black neighbor he went to school with, speaks the same language, and has the same religion.
Racism is not that ethnic groups have an in-group preference, you are trying to re-define your way into winning an argument like a Leftist. It isn't even that racial groups have an in group preference.
This is the culture argument. Followed by a definitional one.
Regardless your "you're redefining is wrong, my definition is right, you're trying to win by definition" is so hackneyed I don't even know if it's worth explaining why.
Arguing about definitions is utterly pointless. You should know better.
So your "it's culture" comment falls flat. Because yes that's the neo-lib conventional wisdom but historically it isn't accurate. And the times it HAS been accurate. It's been modern and exclusive to Whites.
I'm not even editorializing on this point. Conclude what you will.
Thanks for not reading my comment, but choosing to reply anyway.
I'm summarizing you nitwit.
Yes, you summarized it into something I didn't say.
This is the culture argument. Followed by a definitional one.
Regardless your "you're redefining is wrong, my definition is right, you're trying to win by definition" is so hackneyed I don't even know if it's worth explaining why.
Arguing about definitions is utterly pointless. You should know better.