Even among people who have a strong ethnic preference, it certainly is not the case that it is you default to an ingroup preference of a race over ethnicity, and ethnicity over familiarity. An American white is not likely to affiliate with a non-English Russian who shares no religion, value set, language, or economic tie; compared to the American black neighbor he went to school with, speaks the same language, and has the same religion.
Racism is not that ethnic groups have an in-group preference, you are trying to re-define your way into winning an argument like a Leftist. It isn't even that racial groups have an in group preference.
This is the culture argument. Followed by a definitional one.
Regardless your "you're redefining is wrong, my definition is right, you're trying to win by definition" is so hackneyed I don't even know if it's worth explaining why.
Arguing about definitions is utterly pointless. You should know better.
I'm summarizing you nitwit.
Yes, you summarized it into something I didn't say.
This is the culture argument. Followed by a definitional one.
Regardless your "you're redefining is wrong, my definition is right, you're trying to win by definition" is so hackneyed I don't even know if it's worth explaining why.
Arguing about definitions is utterly pointless. You should know better.
It's not an argument. I'm using the correct definition. I didn't make a culture argument, I explicitly stated that race is not ethnicity.
Arguing about definitions isn't pointless when you chose to knowingly misuse it.
Basic linguistics fail go!