Why would it matter? He was a Catholic Spanish explorer. Every portrait of him makes him present as White. He is a White European man whom every libtard, marxist and evangelical faggot who hates because muh colonialism.
Because for at least the past decade Columbus has become the epitome of the evil of whiteness. It's kinda funny that the epitome of evil whiteness may be an ethnic jew. It just slants the identity politics to a funny angle.
Are the people who pulled down his statue now considered antisemitic? And with the constant arguments of to what extent the jews participated in the slave trade, it be funny that the guy now frequently called a slave torturer is a jew.
It matters because when people talk about the evils of that time Columbus is an easy target for them to attack. But if he is an ethnic jew how do they reconcile the attack on the symbol of white people despite him being of the tribe?
The whole "Columbus was a jew" claim is identical to the "Thomas Jefferson had black children" bit. It's all to make you hate your history and your heritage and if you take the time actually looking into it you learn it's not true.
No, they are trying to crash the cultural holiday with its remaining non-progressive holdouts. They always do this with anti-semites and usually it is just another of a billion empty power-seeking lies. Once they establish him as a jew they will establish him as a homo or something to crash Columbus Day for shabbos/ lower level right wingers who they didnt catch in the net by calling him a jew.
I was very interestd in this as a historical mystery. At present, it's a big nothing burger.
“My conclusion is that the documentary never shows Columbus’s DNA and, as scientists, we don’t know what analysis was undertaken.”
Rodrigo Barquera, an expert in archaeogenetics at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, said he was surprised the findings had been shared without prior scrutiny from others in the scientific community.
José Antonio Lorente ... “We have very partial, but sufficient, DNA from Christopher Columbus,” he said. “We have DNA from his son Fernando Colón, and in both the Y [male] chromosome and mitochondrial DNA [transmitted by the mother] of Fernando there are traces compatible with a Jewish origin.”
So is he 100% Jewish? 50%? 25%? Doubtful, as they wouldn't have used the word "trace." Trace usually means you're talking low single digits, meaning one ancestor within multiple generations.
Why would it matter? He was a Catholic Spanish explorer. Every portrait of him makes him present as White. He is a White European man whom every libtard, marxist and evangelical faggot who hates because muh colonialism.
Because for at least the past decade Columbus has become the epitome of the evil of whiteness. It's kinda funny that the epitome of evil whiteness may be an ethnic jew. It just slants the identity politics to a funny angle.
Are the people who pulled down his statue now considered antisemitic? And with the constant arguments of to what extent the jews participated in the slave trade, it be funny that the guy now frequently called a slave torturer is a jew.
It matters because when people talk about the evils of that time Columbus is an easy target for them to attack. But if he is an ethnic jew how do they reconcile the attack on the symbol of white people despite him being of the tribe?
The whole "Columbus was a jew" claim is identical to the "Thomas Jefferson had black children" bit. It's all to make you hate your history and your heritage and if you take the time actually looking into it you learn it's not true.
It doesnt matter what the truth is, what matters is what the masses think is true. Columbus is white is the masses eyes.
Thats why shape shifting is so powerful. How many people know Zelinsky isnt a Slav. Most don't.
I think of all the Boston guineas I know that hold him as an Italian hero and how they will feel when I ask them about this
They'll just quote the Sopranos and continue eating their gabagool
No, they are trying to crash the cultural holiday with its remaining non-progressive holdouts. They always do this with anti-semites and usually it is just another of a billion empty power-seeking lies. Once they establish him as a jew they will establish him as a homo or something to crash Columbus Day for shabbos/ lower level right wingers who they didnt catch in the net by calling him a jew.
I doubt even he knew he was ethnicly a jew, and I find the results nebulous at best.
I was very interestd in this as a historical mystery. At present, it's a big nothing burger.
So is he 100% Jewish? 50%? 25%? Doubtful, as they wouldn't have used the word "trace." Trace usually means you're talking low single digits, meaning one ancestor within multiple generations.
The article says might.