It could be a form of malicious compliance as well. I'm not coping, I have no idea that this will be the case; but I do wonder if there is a mechanism where they are going to slow-walk any enforcement mechanism, or give obvious warnings, or even just refuse to ban non Brazilian accounts that are just repeater accounts. Kind of like how Trump makes Truth Social posts, and people just repost those on Twitter.
Actually... that's an interesting idea. Get the dissidents to use Truth Social.
Brazil was cracking down on all VPN access to stop Twitter so by censoring only from Brazil the Brazilians can still use VPN to see it uncensored, but now the state won't aggressively try to round up those VPN users.
It could be a form of malicious compliance as well. I'm not coping, I have no idea that this will be the case; but I do wonder if there is a mechanism where they are going to slow-walk any enforcement mechanism, or give obvious warnings, or even just refuse to ban non Brazilian accounts that are just repeater accounts. Kind of like how Trump makes Truth Social posts, and people just repost those on Twitter.
Actually... that's an interesting idea. Get the dissidents to use Truth Social.
Brazil was cracking down on all VPN access to stop Twitter so by censoring only from Brazil the Brazilians can still use VPN to see it uncensored, but now the state won't aggressively try to round up those VPN users.
I suppose that's a silver lining.